Talk:...And Out Come the Wolves

Untitled

The link to "Roots Radicals" just redirects you to the article... 65.185.191.51 22:17, 27 October 2006 (UTC)kickasskat

Sales

It says in the article that: "As of 2007, the album has sold 979,000 copies." Yet later in the paragraph, it says that: "It was certified platinum on September 23, 2004."

If it was certified platinum 2 1/2 years ago, shouldn't it have sold 1,000,000 copies already? 24.174.67.72 21:44, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Well, I'm not sure how many copies this album made since nearly twelve years after its release, but I'm guessing it may have sold about over 50 million or less as The Offspring's Smash or anything by Nirvana, Green Day, Social Distortion, who knows? Alex 23:17, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Your guess was so off it's astounding. 50 million? That would be more than Dookie and Smash combined. Tithonfury (talk) 17:35, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Reception

I'm editing the reception slightly. It says that Erlewine said the music was "a veiled reference to the attention the band gained," but he was actually referring to the title. It's minor, but I feel it should be changed. Tithonfury (talk) 17:37, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Dead external links to Allmusic website – January 2011

Since Allmusic have changed the syntax of their URLs, 3 link(s) used in the article do not work anymore and can't be migrated automatically. Please use the search option on http://www.allmusic.com to find the new location of the linked Allmusic article(s) and fix the link(s) accordingly, prefereably by using the {{Allmusic}} template. If a new location cannot be found, the link(s) should be removed. This applies to the following external links:

• http://allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=Aelf1zfo8ehok
• http://allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=Aelf1zfo8ehok
• http://allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=Aelf1zfo8ehok

--CactusBot (talk) 11:28, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:...And Out Come the Wolves/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Start class: Y A reasonably complete infobox Y A lead section giving an overview of the album Y A track listing Y Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current album; a band navbox is insufficient) Y Categorisation at least by artist and year C class: Y All the start class criteria Y A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art Y At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section) Y A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs Y A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians. B class: Y All the C class criteria Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details Y A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians N No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources. Y No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS Sections on Song information and charting have no citations at all. Other then that this is a decent article that's coming along. But it's not up to b-status yet for these reasons. Andrzejbanas (talk) 04:29, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Substituted at 21:28, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ...And Out Come the Wolves. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?table=SEARCH
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110508015352/http://www.billboard.com/ to http://https://www.billboard.com/artist/rancid/chart-history//

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:28, 13 June 2017 (UTC)