Talk:(Drawing) Rings Around the World/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

Promoted

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   I was very impressed with the musical structure section. Not being a musician myself I found it easy to understand. Of course, I don't know what F♯ sounds like but I understood the big picture. The only qualm I have is that your [[weatherman]] wikilink goes to a disambiguation page rather than an actual article. There's nothing in GA criteria that states you should fail for this but I highly recommend changing that. This would be brought up again if you put this article up for peer review or decided to nominate it for featured article.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   The everyHit.com source did bother me because of the fact that I had to do a search to fact check your information and since it's a database it made me think of imdb which is generally not accepted as a reliable source in wikipedia. However, since I've never heard anything bad about everyHit.com then I have no reason to deny promotion.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I encourage you to review another article in the Arts category. For some reason the Arts section has a much longer wait list than the other sections. What I like to do is review the shorter articles because they're much easier to review and critique and it helps people. Also, the more I review other people's article the less time it will take for someone else to review mine. Congratulations. // Gbern3 (talk) 17:22, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

   Thanks Gbern, have fixed the weatherman link. I occasionally do GA reviews but I've been busy at the minute. Cavie78 (talk) 18:16, 9 October 2009 (UTC)