This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled edit
The french version of this article uses somewhat different data. Martinwilke1980 21:58, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Tancredi2009 edit
For some reason Tancredi2009 tags this object with # suggesting his diameter estimate is assumed. The Spitzer Space Telescope estimated that it is 461 ± 45 km in diameter. -- Kheider (talk) 20:01, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Dwarf planet? edit
No, it says "Yes?". It doesn't say "???". DN-boards1 (talk) 20:31, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
@DN-boards1: No. The only mention is in the table: "(26375) ?" Tancredi puts a question mark on this body. And in this other paper, it remains only a candidate: [1]. Please, what is the problem with recording what the reliable sources state?!? BatteryIncluded (talk) 20:34, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- You keep referring to the "Tancredi" reference. The only Tancredi in this article is: Tancredi, G., & Favre, S. (2008) Which are the dwarfs in the Solar System?. It is ONE page long. It has a table on the second column. The question marks are candidates. There is no "Yes" or "No" list. Do you have another paper by Tancredi that is not mentioned in this article? Your edits are unsupported by this reference, so how can you argue against this? BatteryIncluded (talk) 23:13, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- I'm referring to a different one, my bad. I refer to this one: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=7462648&fileId=S1743921310001717. Page 7.
Sorry about the confusion. DN-boards1 (talk) 23:15, 27 August 2015 (UTC)