Talk:Đàn bầu

Latest comment: 9 months ago by 199.247.40.241 in topic Description of pitches


Since when? edit

  • "Its origin goes back to the 7th century." That's what the article says.

vs.

  • "According to the "Dai Nam thuc luc tien bien" the first dan bau was made in 1770."

http://www.tienghatquehuong.com/instruments/DanBau.htm

regards, --峻義 Jùnyì 18:04, 6 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Tieng hat que huong is incorrect. Dai Nam thuc luc tien bien does not say that the first dan bau was made in 1770. Instead, it says that it officially recognizes the dan bau in 1770. According to "Duong thu" (Tang Dynasty historical annals), the dan bau was made in the 7th century. The annals describe how to make a dan bau and how it was played in Viet Nam.

regards, --Thanhhaiphongviet (talk) 20:37, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Additional citations edit

Why and where does this article need additional citations for verification? What references does it need and how should they be added? Hyacinth (talk) 23:15, 20 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

I put in a reference. It's kind of a trivial one, but I think it shows how it is done. Kauffner (talk) 00:12, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your work Hyacinth. I see your name everywhere. Here are the two most educational videos I've found so far. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6jHKJ-h0zU That teacher/performer, Khac Chi, demonstrates a wide range of techniqes in one short piece, such as hammering the far end of the string against the fret-like structures that a few of the instruments have, giving the impression of sounding two notes at once by plucking a certain way (a sort of overtone on the overtone if you will), bending really far, etc. He's the only one that I've seen play the open string (1/1) too. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6ERWC7JhdA That teacher, Thanh Huy, has the most accurate left hand. She immediately bends to the exact traditional (non-12EDO) pitches. 66.27.164.74 (talk) 02:55, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Description of pitches edit

Hm. The description of pitches isn't clear in this sentence: "So the pinky plays flageolets, similar to what guitar players do at the string positions above the octave (1/2), the perfect fifth (2/3), the perfect fourth (3/4), the just major third (4/5), the just minor third (5/6) and two tones not appearing in the Western scale: the septimal minor third (6/7) and the septimal whole tone (7/8)." First, those ratios are upside down, and second, they indicate the intervals between succesively higher notes, not the notes themselves. The notes themselves, relative to the open string, would be 2/1, 3/1, 4/1, 5/1, 6/1, 7/1, and 8/1. For example, if the open string is tuned to C, the available (unbent) pitches are [C, G, C, E, G, Bb, C], not [C, G, F, Eb, Eb-, D] as the quoted series implies. There is no unbent way to pluck the just minor third above C. You have to pluck the just major third and bend down to it. Also, I think the real players skip the 7/1 Bb, so there are 6 standard plucking points, not 7. 66.27.164.74 (talk) 02:25, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

I am playing this instrument and fully agree. 199.247.40.241 (talk) 08:23, 11 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Đàn bầu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:53, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:21, 1 March 2019 (UTC)Reply