Talk:Örjan Ramberg

Funny

Funny there's nothing about his 'off years' when he was a drunkard hanging out at restaurants on Östermalm and drinking up a fortune in cheap red wine. Those were bad years and embarrassing years but he's a man and he can take it. No mention at all and the piece reads like a white wash.

Well, everyone can of course think what they want of Ramberg as a private person. However, this is an encyclopedia article and as such this article should focus on his acting credits. He is listed here because he is a famous person (if he would be a non-known s.c. "nobody" he would not be listed her at all: but he is famous becuase of his successful acting work). He is an acknowledge actor, and as such, this article here should be about his work, credits and accomplishments as an actor (and other information such as biographical information, family connections, info on relationships or private life - when existing - should be stated as "neutral" as possible ("he had a relationship with x and togther they have children xx", etc); as with any other actor, no more, no less; regardless their private person). But perhaps that's just my opinion (but I believe it's also listed in wikipedia guidelines as well, under NPOV).

Nostalgia swe (talk) 22:01, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

An encyclopedic article should contain every important fact about a person's life as long as sources are given. This includes abuse and public rowdiness. It is not possible though to include information about bad behavior unless there has been news published about it so that independent sources can be cited. News editors in Sweden are reluctant to do so if incidents have not come to the attention a considerable portion of the general public. Thus such information rarely appears in media there. Ramberg has not been active outside of Sweden to my knowledge. Also, it is very important not to spread false information, or intentionally damaging information, to the detriment of the reputations of living persons, whether or not (as in Sweden and Britain) slander legislation extremely rarely is enforced. Ethically (there is hardly any viable legislation anywhere), such information should not be spread about deceased persons either unless essential to their life stories. EmilEikS (talk) 04:16, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Örjan Ramberg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070305205200/http://www.dramaten.se:80/Global/Medverkande12/Ramberg%20152px.jpg to http://www.dramaten.se/Global/Medverkande12/Ramberg%20152px.jpg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:12, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Supress unsourced defamation?

Please se my latest article edit! Perhaps the unsourced info I removed should be supressed? It may or may not become well-sourced soon, due to an upcoming documentary about it, but for now it looks like a huge no-no to me--SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:24, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Problematic revisions deleted. In the future, just use Special:EmailUser/Oversight; it's fine to err on the side of caution with these reports. 78.28.54.103 (talk) 17:16, 24 March 2019 (UTC)