Talk:École secondaire Étienne-Brûlé

Fair use rationale for Image:Etienne brule logo.gif

Image:Etienne brule logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Request to lock this page

I am a former student of this school, and I think it is disgusting what the current students have done to this page. Being a school, there are the students and faculty who would wish to add constructive content to this page, and there are the students who just want to have a laugh and vandalise the page. As such, I suggest locking this page so that one must have an account to edit it (the same sort of restrictions imposed on pages with sensitive content, but to a lesser extent).

This article used to be over a page long and contained legitimate information about the school and its extra-curricular work, but this information has since been progressively replaced by immature comments. Bosticko (talk) 03:28, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

I second this suggestion. Only a couple of years ago, this page was of considerable length and of respectable quality; however, today, I surprising found little more than a sentence on this page. I believe this article would greatly benefit from the protection suggested by Bosticko. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silentrebel (talk • contribs) 19:35, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

I made an application for indefinite semi-protection of this page, but it got turned down because the vandalism isn't recent enough. Maybe the relevant information from the older versions should be moved to back onto the page. At least then, the article will be more complete. If there is more vandalism, then we can apply for protection again. --Silentrebel (talk) 21:07, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.clo-ocol.gc.ca/newsletter_cyberbulletin/brule_e.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)