Ronald J. Konopka (1947-2015) was an American geneticist who studied chronobiology.[1] He made his most notable contribution to the field while working with Drosophila in the lab of Seymour Benzer at the California Institute of Technology. During this work, Konopka discovered the period (per) gene, which controls the period of circadian rhythms.[2][3]
Academic career
editRon Konopka received his Ph.D. in Biology from the California Institute of Technology in 1972. In 1975, following his discovery of the period mutants, Konopka was awarded a faculty position at the California Institute of Technology. While there, Konopka's colleagues were critical of his reluctance to publish his work on the period gene, and Konopka was denied tenure. After his stay at Caltech, Konopka accepted a position at Clarkson University but was again denied tenure and subsequently exited the field of science.[4] Konopka's career, interwoven with the work of his mentor, Seymour Benzer, and the other scientists working in Benzer's lab is narrated in Time, Love, Memory by Jonathan Weiner.
Konopka's discovery and genetic analysis of period and several other circadian rhythm mutations became the basis of the research done by Drs. Jeffrey C. Hall, Michael Rosbash, and Michael W. Young, who were awarded the 2017 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.
Research
editPeriod mutants
editDiscovery of Period
editAs a graduate student in Seymour Benzer's lab, Konopka sought to use Benzer's method of behavioral genetics to unravel the mysteries of the "master clock" that existed in every organism.[5] He used ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) to induce point mutations in the Drosophila melanogaster genome, and eventually isolated three mutants with abnormal rhythms in eclosion. He mapped the mutations to the same location on the far left of the X chromosome, less than 1 centimorgan away from the white gene locus. These mutations were alternative alleles of a gene that Konopka subsequently named period.[6] While wild type flies have a circadian period around 24 hours, Konopka found the per01 mutant was arrhythmic, the perS mutant had a period of 19 hours, and the perL had a period of 29 hours.
Neurobiology of per mutants
editIn 1979 and a 1980, Konopka and Dominic Orr tested whether mutations in per mutations affected the period of the entire circadian cycle or just a portion of it. By comparing the light responses of perS eclosion rhythm to that of wild type flies, Konopka and Orr found that light pulses reset the mutant clock to a greater extent than the wild type clock (about 10 hours for perS compared to 3 hours for wild type flies). They also observed that the while duration of the light-sensitive part of the day (subjective night) was found to be similar between perS and wild type flies, the duration of the light-insensitive part of the cycle (subjective day) was 5 hours shorter in mutant flies than in wild type flies. They concluded that differences in period length between mutant and wild type flies could be accounted for by a shortening of the subjective day, or the active part of the circadian cycle, in perS mutants. From this, Konopka concluded that separate molecular processes correspond to the subjective night and subjective day and that the perS allele acts by shortening the subjective day while leaving the subjective night unchanged. Based on these findings, Konopka and Orr constructed a model for the action of the per gene. The oscillation is interpreted in terms of a membrane gradient that is established during the subjective day and dissipates during the subjective night. The model predicts that the per gene product is active during the subjective day and functions like a pump to establish the gradient. Once a high threshold is reached, the pump shuts off and light-sensitive channels open to dissipate the gradient. A light pulse during the subjective night closes the channels and starts the pump; the value of the gradient when the channels close is the same as the value when the pump starts, and thus a reset in the cycle is produced and an oscillation results.[7] This model has been replaced with a transcription translation negative feedback model involving timeless, clock, and cycle.[8]
Also in 1980, Konopka and Steven Wells reported an abnormality in the morphology of a neurosecretory cell group associated with the arrhythmic per01 mutation and with 2 arrhythmic mutants of another fly strain, Drosophila pseudoobscura. This cell group normally consists of four clustered cells in either side of the brain, roughly halfway between the top and bottom edge, in the posterior area of the brain. Cells in this cluster are occasionally located abnormally near the top edge, rather than the middle, of the brain at a rate of about 17% of cells in wild-type D. melanogaster. The per01 mutation significantly increases the percentage of abnormally located cells to about 40%. In two aperiodic strains of D. pseudoobscura, the percentages of abnormally located cells are likewise significantly increased over those in the wild type. Konopka inferred from the results that neurosecretory cells may be part of the Drosophila circadian system and that per gene product may influence the development of these cells.[9]
Pacemaker signalling
editIn 1979 Konopka worked with Alfred Handler to discover the nature behind pacemaker signalling by transplanting brains of donor flies into abdomens of arrhythmic host flies. They found that circadian rhythms in host flies were restored with the period of the donor; for example, short period (perS) adult brains implanted into the abdomens of arrhythmic (per01) hosts could confer a short period rhythm on the activity of some hosts for at least 4 cycles.[10] Since the transplanted brains were unable to create new neuronal connections to locomotor activity centers, Konopka and Handler concluded that pacemaker signalling for locomotion must be humoral and not neuronal.[10]
Reciprocal behavior of per mutants
editWhile at Clarkson College, Konopka continued his work with Orr and also collaborated with chronobiologist Colin Pittendrigh. During the collaboration, Konopka worked to understand behaviors of Drosophila per mutants beyond their abnormal period lengths. Konopka was primarily interested in how these mutants behaved in constant light or constant darkness and whether they conformed to the rules established by chronobiologist Jurgen Aschoff. In addition, Konopka also observed behavior of the flies under varying light intensities and over a range of temperatures. Konopka found that the perS and perL flies showed reciprocal behaviors under the experimental conditions.[11] For example, perS period shortened, while perL period lengthened in response to decreasing temperature.[11] Konopka hypothesized that these reciprocal behaviors were a manifestation of two coupled oscillators, a model proposed in 1976 by Pittendrigh and Daan.[12]
Other circadian mutants
editClock mutants
editIn 1990, Konopka collaborated with Mitchell S. Dushay and Jeffery C. Hall to further investigate the effects of the clock gene in D. melanogaster. Konopka had noted in 1987 that the Clock (Clk) mutant, induced via chemical mutation, was a semidominant mutation that shortened the rhythm of locomotor activity in flies by around 1.5hr.[7] Dushay, Konopka and Hall noted that Clk mutants had phase response curve that was shortened from 24hr to 22.5hr, and that the short period was also observable in the eclosion rhythm of the mutant flies.[13] Clk was mapped close enough to the per01 mutation such that it could be considered a per allele, but due to the presence normal courtship song rhythms in Clk males and the lack of coverage of its effects via duplications, Dushay and Konopka determined that Clock was a novel circadian mutation.[13]
Andante mutants
editBy working with Randall F. Smith and Dominic Orr of Caltech, Konopka discovered a new circadian mutant, named Andante, in 1990.[14] In contrast to Clock, Andante lengthens the period of eclosion, and locomotor activity by 1.5–2 hours, and was also shown to lengthen the periods of other circadian mutants.[14] Andante is a semi-dominant mutation, temperature compensated, and unaffected by the sine oculis mutation, which eliminates the outer visual system of flies. It was mapped to the 10E1-2 to 10F1 region of the D. melanogaster X chromosome, close to the miniature-dusky locus.[14]
References
edit- ^ Rosbash, Michael (April 9, 2015). "Ronald J. Konopka (1947–2015)". Cell. 161 (2): 187–188. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.038. PMID 26042238.
- ^ Denlinger, David L.; J. M. Giebultowicz; David Stanley Saunders (2001). Insect timing: circadian rhythmicity to seasonality. Gulf Professional Publishing. p. 17. ISBN 978-0-444-50608-5. Retrieved March 31, 2011.
- ^ Greenspan, Ralph, (2003). "The 2003 Genetics Society of America Medal" Retrieved April 13, 2011.
- ^ Barondes, S (2000) A Real-life Arrowsmith Finds His Sinclair Lewis Retrieved April 13, 2011.
- ^ Weiner, Jonathan. "Time, Love, Memory: A Great Biologist and His Quest for the Origins of Behavior" Alfred A. Knopf, Inc, 1999
- ^ Konopka, R.; Benzer, Seymour (1971). "Clock Mutants of Drosophila melanogaster". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 68 (9): 2112–6. Bibcode:1971PNAS...68.2112K. doi:10.1073/pnas.68.9.2112. PMC 389363. PMID 5002428.
- ^ a b Konopka, Ronald J (1987). "Genetics of Biological Rhythms in Drosophila". Annu. Rev. Genet. 21: 227–236. doi:10.1146/annurev.ge.21.120187.001303. PMID 3327464.
- ^ Ishida N, Kaneko M, Allada R (August 1999). "Biological clocks". Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96 (16): 8819–20. Bibcode:1999PNAS...96.8819I. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.16.8819. PMC 33693. PMID 10430850.
- ^ Konopka, RJ; Wells (1980). "Drosophila clock mutations affect the morphology of a brain neurosecretory cell group". Journal of Neurobiology. 11 (4): 411–415. doi:10.1002/neu.480110407. PMID 7400816.
- ^ a b Handler, A & Konopka, R (1979). "Transplantation of a circadian pacemaker in Drosophila". Nature. 279 (5710): 236–238. Bibcode:1979Natur.279..236H. doi:10.1038/279236a0. PMID 440433. S2CID 4369719.
- ^ a b Konopka RJ, Pittendrigh C, Orr D (2007). "Reciprocal behaviour associated with altered homeostasis and photosensitivity of Drosophila clock mutants". J. Neurogenet. 21 (4): 243–52. doi:10.1080/01677060701695391. PMID 18161586. S2CID 25159075.
- ^ Pittendrigh CS, Daan S (1976). "A functional analysis of circadian pacemakers in nocturnal rodents V. Pacemaker structure: a clock for a seasons". J. Comp. Physiol. 106: 333–55. doi:10.1007/BF01417860. S2CID 206794951.
- ^ a b Dushay MS, Konopka RJ, Orr D, Greenacre ML, Kyriacou CP, Rosbash M, Hall JC (1990). "Phenotypic and genetic analysis of Clock, a new circadian rhythm mutant in Drosophila melanogaster". Genetics. 125 (3): 557–78. doi:10.1093/genetics/125.3.557. PMC 1204083. PMID 2116357.
- ^ a b c Konopka RJ, Smith RF, Orr D (1991). "Characterization of Andante, a new Drosophila clock mutant, and its interactions with other clock mutants". J. Neurogenet. 7 (2–3): 103–114. doi:10.3109/01677069109066214. PMID 2030465.