Portal talk:Current events/2018 November 7
 | This portal does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sessions fired edit
- Sessions writes: “At your (Trump's) request, I am submitting my resignation.” So it's clear that he's fired. That's also what the WP:source says. Wakari07 (talk) 21:50, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- In fairness, sorry but EACH AND EVERY TIME an Obama cabinet member left office other than death the designation was "RESIGN" on the events page, regardless, of whatever cherry-picked source you have used to push such bias - thus, your only purpose for new wording can be nothing but a bias push now = fails wp:soapbox--2600:8800:FF0E:1200:504A:F75F:C9AB:5DDC (talk) 21:56, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- I didn't even choose the source. Regardless, the source is reliable and other reliable sources don't write anything different. Even Fox writes: "Jeff Sessions resigns as attorney general, at Trump's 'request'" as a headline, and Trump is "pleased". Wakari07 (talk) 21:59, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- like I said this issue has already seen endless Refer to Admins - in fairness it is always "resign" plain and simple - I tell you this knowing full well you have broken several rules already with reverts after I told you the issue has already seen endless Refer to Admins - thus, whatever purpose can you have but wp:soapbox or worse wp:nothere--2600:8800:FF0E:1200:504A:F75F:C9AB:5DDC (talk) 22:02, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- I didn't even choose the source. Regardless, the source is reliable and other reliable sources don't write anything different. Even Fox writes: "Jeff Sessions resigns as attorney general, at Trump's 'request'" as a headline, and Trump is "pleased". Wakari07 (talk) 21:59, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- In fairness, sorry but EACH AND EVERY TIME an Obama cabinet member left office other than death the designation was "RESIGN" on the events page, regardless, of whatever cherry-picked source you have used to push such bias - thus, your only purpose for new wording can be nothing but a bias push now = fails wp:soapbox--2600:8800:FF0E:1200:504A:F75F:C9AB:5DDC (talk) 21:56, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- and to be clear you have been given 17 warnings in your history over edit warring over US history issues
User talk:Wakari07/Archive 16-09-2012 full#September 2012
User talk:Wakari07/Arch2#December 6, 2017 edits on the current events portal page
User talk:Wakari07/Arch2#December 8, 2017 edits on the current events portal page
User talk:Wakari07/Arch2#December 9, 2017 edits on the current events portal page
User talk:Wakari07/Arch2#December 2017
User talk:Wakari07/Arch2#Disruptive editing warning
User talk:Wakari07/Arch2#Notice
User talk:Wakari07/Arch2#Portal:Current events/2017 December 13
User talk:Wakari07/Arch2#January 16 2018 edits on the current events portal page
User talk:Wakari07/Arch2#Portal:Current events/2018 March 5
User talk:Wakari07/Arch2#ANI
User talk:Wakari07/Arch2#April 2018
User talk:Wakari07/Arch2#ARBPIA DS alert
User talk:Wakari07/Arch2#Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
User talk:Wakari07/Arch2#Portal:Current events/2018 June 20 edit warring
User talk:Wakari07#August 2018
User talk:Wakari07#Personal attacks
so I will remind that the following is in effect:
Note edit
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.--2600:8800:FF0E:1200:504A:F75F:C9AB:5DDC (talk) 22:14, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Response to third opinion request:
"at Trump's request" is totally fine, as that is what reliable sources are saying. Please don't edit war over it. Bradv 22:27, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- like I said this issue has already seen endless Refer to Admins - in fairness it is always "resign" plain and simple - the issue has already seen endless Refer to Admins - thus, whatever purpose can you have but wp:soapbox or worse wp:nothere--2600:8800:FF0E:1200:504A:F75F:C9AB:5DDC (talk) 22:39, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- When someone's resignation is requested by their employer, they have been fired. It is as simple as that. To state otherwise is to whitewash the truth. Icarosaurvus (talk) 10:30, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
- like I said this issue has already seen endless Refer to Admins - in fairness it is always "resign" plain and simple - the issue has already seen endless Refer to Admins - thus, whatever purpose can you have but wp:soapbox or worse wp:nothere--2600:8800:FF0E:1200:504A:F75F:C9AB:5DDC (talk) 22:39, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- I note the block history for 2600:8800:ff0e:1200::/64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · block user · block log) (which includes this irksome IP) is most illuminating. Just ignore the troll. 95.148.229.221 (talk) 03:27, 13 February 2019 (UTC)