![]() Cube |
![]() Hexagonal prism |
![]() Rhombic dodecahedron |
![]() Elongated dodecahedron |
![]() Truncated octahedron |
In geometry, a parallelohedron is a polyhedron that can be translated without rotations in 3-dimensional Euclidean space to fill space with a honeycomb in which all copies of the polyhedron meet face-to-face. There are five types of parallelohedron, first identified by Evgraf Fedorov in 1885 in his studies of crystallographic systems: the cube, hexagonal prism, rhombic dodecahedron, elongated dodecahedron, and truncated octahedron.[1]
Classification
editEvery parallelohedron is a zonohedron, a centrally symmetric polyhedron with centrally symmetric faces. Like any zonohedron, it can be constructed as the Minkowski sum of line segments, one segment for each parallel class of edges of the polyhedron. For parallelohedra, there are between three and six of these parallel classes. The lengths of the segments can be adjusted arbitrarily; doing so extends or shrinks the corresponding edges of the parallelohedron, without changing its combinatorial type or its property of tiling space. As a limiting case, for a parallelohedron with more than three parallel classes of edges, the length of any one of these classes can be adjusted to zero, producing another parallelohedron of a simpler form, with one fewer class of parallel edges.[2] As with all zonohedra, these shapes automatically have 2 Ci central inversion symmetry,[1] but additional symmetries are possible with an appropriate choice of the generating segments.[3]
The five types of parallelohedron are:[1]
- A parallelepiped, generated from three line segments that are not all parallel to a common plane. Its most symmetric form is the cube, generated by three perpendicular unit-length line segments.[1] It tiles space to form the cubic honeycomb.
- A hexagonal prism, generated from four line segments, three of them parallel to a common plane and the fourth not. Its most symmetric form is the right prism over a regular hexagon.[1] It tiles space to form the hexagonal prismatic honeycomb.
- The rhombic dodecahedron, generated from four line segments, no two of which are parallel to a common plane. Its most symmetric form is generated by the four long diagonals of a cube.[1] It tiles space to form the rhombic dodecahedral honeycomb.
- The elongated dodecahedron, generated from five line segments, with two triples of coplanar segments. It can be generated by using an edge of the cube and its four long diagonals as generators.[1] It tiles space to form the elongated dodecahedral honeycomb.
- The truncated octahedron, generated from six line segments with four triples of coplanar segments. It can be embedded in four-dimensional space as the 4-permutahedron, whose vertices are all permutations of the counting numbers (1,2,3,4). In three-dimensional space, its most symmetric form is generated from six line segments parallel to the face diagonals of a cube.[1] It tiles space to form the bitruncated cubic honeycomb.
Any zonohedron whose faces have the same combinatorial structure as one of these five shapes is a parallelohedron, regardless of its particular angles or edge lengths. For example, any affine transformation of a parallelohedron will produce another parallelohedron of the same type.[1]
Name | Cube (parallelepiped) |
Hexagonal prism Elongated cube |
Rhombic dodecahedron | Elongated dodecahedron | Truncated octahedron |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Images (colors indicate parallel edges) | |||||
Number of generators | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
Vertices | 8 | 12 | 14 | 18 | 24 |
Edges | 12 | 18 | 24 | 28 | 36 |
Faces | 6 | 8 | 12 | 12 | 14 |
Tiling | |||||
Tiling name and Coxeter–Dynkin diagram | Cubic |
Hexagonal prismatic |
Rhombic dodecahedral |
Elongated dodecahedral | Bitruncated cubic |
Symmetries
editWhen further subdivided according to their symmetry groups, there are 22 forms of the parallelohedra. For each form, the centers of its copies in its honeycomb form the points of one of the 14 Bravais lattices. Because there are fewer Bravais lattices than symmetric forms of parallelohedra, certain pairs of parallelohedra map to the same Bravais lattice.[3]
By placing one endpoint of each generating line segment of a parallelohedron at the origin of three-dimensional space, the generators may be represented as three-dimensional vectors, the positions of their opposite endpoints. For this placement of the segments, one vertex of the parallelohedron will itself be at the origin, and the rest will be at positions given by sums of certain subsets of these vectors. A parallelohedron with vectors can in this way be parameterized by coordinates, three for each vector, but only some of these combinations are valid (because of the requirement that certain triples of segments lie in parallel planes, or equivalently that certain triples of vectors are coplanar) and different combinations may lead to parallelohedra that differ only by a rotation, scaling transformation, or more generally by an affine transformation. When affine transformations are factored out, the number of free parameters that describe the shape of a parallelohedron is zero for a parallelepiped (all parallelepipeds are equivalent to each other under affine transformations), two for a hexagonal prism, three for a rhombic dodecahedron, four for an elongated dodecahedron, and five for a truncated octahedron.[4]
History
editThe classification of parallelohedra into five types was first made by Russian crystallographer Evgraf Fedorov, as chapter 13 of a Russian-language book first published in 1885, whose title has been translated into English as An Introduction to the Theory of Figures.[5] Some of the mathematics in this book is faulty; for instance it includes an incorrect proof of a lemma stating that every monohedral tiling of the plane is eventually periodic,[6] proven to be false in 2023 as part of the solution to the einstein problem.[7] In the case of parallelohedra, Fedorov assumed without proof that every parallelohedron is centrally symmetric, and used this assumption to prove his classification. The classification of parallelohedra was later placed on a firmer footing by Hermann Minkowski, who used his uniqueness theorem for polyhedra with given face normals and areas to prove that parallelohedra are centrally symmetric.[1]
Related shapes
editIn two dimensions the analogous figure to a parallelohedron is a parallelogon, a polygon that can tile the plane edge-to-edge by translation. These are parallelograms and hexagons with opposite sides parallel and of equal length.[8]
In higher dimensions a parallelohedron is called a parallelotope. There are 52 different four-dimensional parallelotopes, first enumerated by Boris Delaunay (with one missing parallelotope, later discovered by Mikhail Shtogrin),[9] and more than 100,000 types in five dimensions.[10][11] Unlike the case for three dimensions, not all of them are zonotopes. 17 of the four-dimensional parallelotopes are zonotopes, one is the regular 24-cell, and the remaining 34 of these shapes are Minkowski sums of zonotopes with the 24-cell.[12] A -dimensional parallelotope can have at most facets, with the permutohedron achieving this maximum.[2]
A plesiohedron is a broader class of three-dimensional space-filling polyhedra, formed from the Voronoi diagrams of periodic sets of points.[8] As Boris Delaunay proved in 1929,[13] every parallelohedron can be made into a plesiohedron by an affine transformation,[1] but this remains open in higher dimensions,[2] and in three dimensions there also exist other plesiohedra that are not parallelohedra. The tilings of space by plesiohedra have symmetries taking any cell to any other cell, but unlike for the parallelohedra, these symmetries may involve rotations, not just translations.[8]
References
edit- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Alexandrov, A. D. (2005). "8.1 Parallelohedra". Convex Polyhedra. Springer. pp. 349–359.
- ^ a b c Dienst, Thilo. "Fedorov's five parallelohedra in R3". University of Dortmund. Archived from the original on 2016-03-04.
- ^ a b Tutton, A. E. H. (1922). Crystallography and Practical Crystal Measurement, Vol. I: Form and Structure. Macmillan. p. 567.
- ^ Dolbilin, Nikolai P.; Itoh, Jin-ichi; Nara, Chie (2012). "Affine classes of 3-dimensional parallelohedra – their parametrization". In Akiyama, Jin; Kano, Mikio; Sakai, Toshinori (eds.). Computational Geometry and Graphs - Thailand-Japan Joint Conference, TJJCCGG 2012, Bangkok, Thailand, December 6-8, 2012, Revised Selected Papers. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 8296. Springer. pp. 64–72. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-45281-9_6.
- ^ Fedorov, E. S. (1885). Начала учения о фигурах [Introduction to the Theory of Figures] (in Russian).
- ^ Senechal, Marjorie; Galiulin, R. V. (1984). "An introduction to the theory of figures: the geometry of E. S. Fedorov". Structural Topology (in English and French) (10): 5–22. hdl:2099/1195. MR 0768703.
- ^ Roberts, Siobhan (March 29, 2023). "Elusive 'Einstein' solves a longstanding math problem". The New York Times.
- ^ a b c Grünbaum, Branko; Shephard, G. C. (1980). "Tilings with congruent tiles". Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society. New Series. 3 (3): 951–973. doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-1980-14827-2. MR 0585178.
- ^ Engel, P. (1988). Hargittai, I.; Vainshtein, B.K. (eds.). "Mathematical problems in modern crystallography". Crystal Symmetries: Shubnikov Centennial Papers. Computers & Mathematics with Applications. 16 (5–8): 425–436. doi:10.1016/0898-1221(88)90232-5. MR 0991578. See in particular p. 435.
- ^ Engel, Peter (2000). "The contraction types of parallelohedra in ". Acta Crystallographica. 56 (5): 491–496. doi:10.1107/S0108767300007145. MR 1784709.
- ^ Sloane, N. J. A. (ed.). "Sequence A071880 (Number of combinatorial types of n-dimensional parallelohedra)". The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences. OEIS Foundation.
- ^ Deza, Michel; Grishukhin, Viacheslav P. (2008). "More about the 52 four-dimensional parallelotopes". Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics. 12 (4): 901–916. arXiv:math/0307171. doi:10.11650/twjm/1500404985. MR 2426535.
- ^ Austin, David (November 2013). "Fedorov's five parallelohedra". AMS Feature Column. American Mathematical Society.