Malloy v. South Carolina, 237 U.S. 180 (1915), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that retroactively changing the execution method does not violate the Ex post facto clause.[1]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ "Malloy v. South Carolina, 237 U.S. 180 (1915)". Justia Law. Retrieved September 16, 2022.
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |