Kuettlingeria neotaurica is a species of saxicolous (rock-dwelling), crustose lichen in the family Teloschistaceae.[2]
| Kuettlingeria neotaurica | |
|---|---|
| |
| Growing on volcanic rock in Portugal | |
Scientific classification 
| |
| Domain: | Eukaryota |
| Kingdom: | Fungi |
| Division: | Ascomycota |
| Class: | Lecanoromycetes |
| Order: | Teloschistales |
| Family: | Teloschistaceae |
| Genus: | Kuettlingeria |
| Species: | K. neotaurica
|
| Binomial name | |
| Kuettlingeria neotaurica (Vondrák, Khodos., Arup & Søchting) I.V.Frolov, Vondrák & Arup (2020)
| |
| Synonyms[1] | |
| |
Taxonomy edit
The lichen was first formally described as a new species in 2012 by the lichenologists Jan Vondrák, Alexander Khodosovtsev, Ulf Arup, and Ulrik Søchting; it was initially classified as a member of the genus Caloplaca. The type specimen was collected by the first author from Mount Svyataya (Kara Dag Mountain, Sudak, Ukraine) at an elevation of 320 m (1,050 ft), where it was found growing on volcanic rock. The species epithet alludes to the geographical region where it is commonly found, the Crimean Peninsula. Historically, this area was referred to as "Taurica" by the ancient Greeks and Romans. The name "Caloplaca taurica" had been previously attributed by Mereschkowsky in an informal manner (a nomen nudum), to a species later recognised as Caloplaca inconnexa (Nyl.) Zahlbr. Although this earlier naming was not validly published and thus did not formally restrict the use of the name for the new species, the authors decided not to adopt it for Caloplaca neotaurica, to prevent any potential confusion between the two species, leading to the distinct naming of Caloplaca neotaurica.[3] Sergey Kondratyuk proposed that the species should be in the genus Pyrenodesmia in 2020.[4] It was transferred to the genus Kuettlingeria in 2020.[5]
Description edit
Kuettlingeria neotaurica is characterised by a thallus (the main lichen body) that typically appears dark grey to brown-black, although it can occasionally have a white, powdery coating (pruina). The thallus is relatively thin, generally not exceeding 150 μm in thickness, and lacks both marginal squamules (small, scale-like structures) and vegetative propagules (reproductive parts that help in dispersal).[3]
The apothecia (reproductive structures where spores are produced) of Kuettlingeria neotaurica are small, with a maximum diameter of about 0.7 mm, and are biatorine in form, meaning they have a flat disc and a clearly distinguishable margin. These apothecia have an orange-red colour, which turns purple when treated with the C spot test (C+ purple). In grey variants of the apothecia, this reaction may not be observed.[3]
The ascospores (spores produced in the asci) of Kuettlingeria neotaurica are approximately 14 to 17 μm wide and 75 to 105 μm long. They typically possess septa (dividing walls within the spore) around 4.0 to 7.5 μm wide. Additionally, the species forms pycnidia, which are small, grey reproductive structures that produce conidia (asexual, non-motile spores). These conidia are ellipsoid in shape and measure about 2.5–3.5 to 1.0 by 1.5 μm.[3]
Habitat and distribution edit
Kuettlingeria neotaurica predominantly inhabits siliceous rock cliffs, outcrops, and stones located in the proximity of sea coasts. While this species is primarily coastal, it has been occasionally observed inland, specifically in regions like the Peloponnese in Greece and the Rhodope Mountains in Bulgaria. Its geographical distribution encompasses the Mediterranean and the Black Sea coastal areas, with a presence in the Crimean Peninsula. Furthermore, this lichen extends along the Atlantic coast of Europe, including confirmed sightings in Great Britain.[3]
A distinct variation of Kuettlingeria neotaurica, characterised by grey apothecia, has been identified exclusively in limited areas. These unique phenotypes have been recorded only in the Crimean Peninsula, Cyprus, and Greece, indicating a more localised distribution for this particular variant within the species' overall range.[3]
References edit
- ^ "Synonymy. Current Name: Kuettlingeria neotaurica (Vondrák, Khodos., Arup & Søchting) I.V. Frolov, Vondrák & Arup, in Frolov, Vondrák, Košnar & Arup, Journal of Systematics and Evolution 59(3): 468 (2020)". Species Fungorum. Retrieved 25 January 2024.
- ^ "Kuettlingeria neotaurica (Vondrák, Khodos., Arup & Søchting) I.V. Frolov, Vondrák & Arup". Catalogue of Life. Species 2000: Leiden, the Netherlands. Retrieved 25 January 2023.
- ^ a b c d e f Vondrák, Jan; Šoun, Jaroslav; Vondrávov, Olga; Fryday, Alan M.; Khodosovtsev, Alexander; Davydov, Evgeny A. (2012). "Absence of anthraquinone pigments is paraphyletic and a phylogenetically unreliable character in the Teloschistaceae". The Lichenologist. 44 (3): 401–418. doi:10.1017/S0024282911000843.
- ^ Kondratyuk, S.Y.; Lőkös, L.; Farkas, E.; Kärnefelt, I.; Thell, A.; Yamamoto, Y.; Hur, J.-S. (2020). "Three new genera of the Teloschistaceae proved by three gene phylogeny" (PDF). Acta Botanica Hungarica. 62 (1–2): 109–136. doi:10.1556/034.62.2020.1-2.7.
- ^ Frolov, Ivan; Vondrák, Jan; Košnar, Jiří; Arup, Ulf (2020). "Phylogenetic relationships within Pyrenodesmia sensu lato and the role of pigments in its taxonomic interpretation". Journal of Systematics and Evolution. 59 (3): 454–474. doi:10.1111/jse.12717.