Horsburgh v NZ Meat Processors Industrial Union of Workers

Horsburgh v NZ Meat Processors Industrial Union of Workers CA102/86 [1988] NZCA 75; [1988] 1 NZLR 698; (1988) 2 NZELC 96,397; (1988) ERNZ Sel Cas 193 is a cited case in New Zealand law allowing (albeit through the backdoor) compensation for non financial loss, for example for distress. It effectively overruled Addis v Gramophone Co Ltd [1909] AC 488 in NZ case law.

Horsburgh v NZ Meat Processors Industrial Union of Workers
Court	Court of Appeal of New Zealand
Full case name	Joseph Robert John Horsburgh v NZ Meat Processors, Packers, Preservers, Freezing Works and Related Trades Industrial Union of Workers
Decided	21 June 1988
Citation	CA102/86 [1988] NZCA 75; [1988] 1 NZLR 698; (1988) 2 NZELC 96,397; (1988) ERNZ Sel Cas 193 (21 June 1988)
Transcript	copy of judgment
Court membership
Judges sitting	Cooke P, Somers J, Hardie Boys J

Background

Horsburgh was a member of the local meat workers union. In order to support its striking members at a nearby plant, the union required all its members to contribute to a $10 a week strike fund. Horsburgh refused to make these payments, resulting in his expulsion from the union, and due to compulsory unionism at the time, he then lost his job. It was later discovered that the strike levy was illegal to collect, due to it not being first subject to a secret ballot.

He sued the union for loss of income, as well as for the distress for losing his job.

Held

The court of appeal awarded him $8,000 for the distress of losing his job. This was on the basis that this case involved not an employment issue, but for wrongly being expelled from the union, a tenuous basis, considering the loss of his union membership did result in him losing his job.