The Harmon Doctrine, or the doctrine of absolute territorial sovereignty,[1] holds that a country has absolute sovereignty over the territory and resources within its borders.[1][2]
Background edit
The doctrine is named after U.S. Attorney General Judson Harmon, who made a comment during the Chamizal dispute, a dispute between USA and Mexico over the Rio Grande in 1895, in reference to international watercourses[3][4] —
The fact that the Rio Grande lacks sufficient water to permit its use by the inhabitants of both countries does not entitle Mexico to impose restrictions on the USA [...] The fundamental principle of international law is the absolute sovereignty of every nation, as against all others, within its own territory. All exceptions […] to the full and complete power of a nation within its own territories must be traced up to the consent of the nation itself. They can flow from no other legitimate source. [...] [T]he rules, principles, and precedents of international law impose no liability or obligation upon the United States.
References edit
- ^ a b Stephen C. McCaffrey (1996). The Harmon Doctrine One Hundred Years Later: Buried, Not Praised, 36 Nat. Resources J. 965.
- ^ "Harmon doctrine". United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia. Retrieved 2020-12-12.
- ^ "Part 2. Article 5. (5.1.1) Theories of allocation". UN Watercourses Convention. Retrieved 2020-12-12.
- ^ Rahaman, M.M. (2009) 'Principles of international water law: creating effective transboundary water resources management', Int. J. Sustainable Society, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp.207–223.
Further reading edit
- What does international law say about water allocation? United Nations Economic Commission for Europe
 | This law-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |