The Grayburg Formation is a geologic formation in west Texas and southern New Mexico.[1] It preserves fossils dating back to the Guadalupian Epoch of the Permian Period.[2]

Grayburg Formation
Stratigraphic range: Guadalupian
TypeFormation
Unit ofArtesia Group
UnderliesQueen Formation
OverliesSan Andres Formation
Thickness294 feet (90 m)
Lithology
PrimaryDolomite
OtherSandstone, anhydrite
Location
Coordinates32°50′38″N 104°01′01″W / 32.844°N 104.017°W / 32.844; -104.017
RegionNew Mexico
Texas
CountryUnited States
Type section
Named forGrayburg pool
Named byR.I. Dickey
Year defined1940
Grayburg Formation is located in the United States
Grayburg Formation
Grayburg Formation (the United States)
Grayburg Formation is located in New Mexico
Grayburg Formation
Grayburg Formation (New Mexico)

Description

edit

The formation is found mostly in the subsurface and consists mostly of dolomite with some sandstone and anhydrite.[1] The formation becomes more dominantly carbonate rock near the Guadalupe Reef and the beds become thicker. Away from the reef, the formation becomes increasingly dominated by sandstone.[2]

The formation is interpreted as shallow marine sediments deposited on the San Andres platform, which flanked the Delaware and Midland Basins. The interbedded carbonate rocks and sandstone reflect fluctuations in sea level.[3]

History of investigation

edit

The formation was first defined by Robert I. Dickey in 1940 based on well logs. Dickey assigned the formation to the now-defunct Whitehorse Group.[1] D.B. Tait, W.S. Motts, and M.E. Spitler reassigned the formation to the Artesia Group in 1962.[4] V.C. Kelley subsequently adjusted the definition of the lower contact of the formation, in 1971.[2]

Footnotes

edit
  1. ^ a b c Dickey 1940.
  2. ^ a b c Kelley 1971.
  3. ^ Barnaby, R.J.; Ward, W.B. (1 January 2007). "Outcrop Analog for Mixed Siliciclastic-Carbonate Ramp Reservoirs--Stratigraphic Hierarchy, Facies Architecture, and Geologic Heterogeneity: Grayburg Formation, Permian Basin, U.S.A.". Journal of Sedimentary Research. 77 (1): 34–58. doi:10.2110/jsr.2007.007.
  4. ^ Tait, Motts & Spitler 1962.

References

edit