Fisher–Tippett–Gnedenko theorem

In statistics, the Fisher–Tippett–Gnedenko theorem (also the Fisher–Tippett theorem or the extreme value theorem) is a general result in extreme value theory regarding asymptotic distribution of extreme order statistics. The maximum of a sample of iid random variables after proper renormalization can only converge in distribution to one of only 3 possible distribution families: the Gumbel distribution, the Fréchet distribution, or the Weibull distribution. Credit for the extreme value theorem and its convergence details are given to Fréchet (1927),[1] Fisher and Tippett (1928),[2] Mises (1936),[3][4] and Gnedenko (1943).[5]

The role of the extremal types theorem for maxima is similar to that of central limit theorem for averages, except that the central limit theorem applies to the average of a sample from any distribution with finite variance, while the Fisher–Tippet–Gnedenko theorem only states that if the distribution of a normalized maximum converges, then the limit has to be one of a particular class of distributions. It does not state that the distribution of the normalized maximum does converge.

Statement edit

Let   be an n-sized sample of independent and identically-distributed random variables, each of whose cumulative distribution function is   Suppose that there exist two sequences of real numbers   and   such that the following limits converge to a non-degenerate distribution function:

 

or equivalently:

 

In such circumstances, the limiting distribution   belongs to either the Gumbel, the Fréchet, or the Weibull distribution family.[6]

In other words, if the limit above converges, then up to a linear change of coordinates   will assume either the form:[7]

  for  

with the non-zero parameter   also satisfying   for every   value supported by   (for all values   for which  ). Otherwise it has the form:

  for  

This is the cumulative distribution function of the generalized extreme value distribution (GEV) with extreme value index   The GEV distribution groups the Gumbel, Fréchet, and Weibull distributions into a single composite form.

Conditions of convergence edit

The Fisher–Tippett–Gnedenko theorem is a statement about the convergence of the limiting distribution   above. The study of conditions for convergence of   to particular cases of the generalized extreme value distribution began with Mises (1936)[3][5][4] and was further developed by Gnedenko (1943).[5]

Let   be the distribution function of   and   be some i.i.d. sample thereof.
Also let   be the population maximum:  

The limiting distribution of the normalized sample maximum, given by   above, will then be:[7]


Fréchet distribution  
For strictly positive   the limiting distribution converges if and only if
 
and
  for all  
In this case, possible sequences that will satisfy the theorem conditions are
 
and
 
Strictly positive   corresponds to what is called a heavy tailed distribution.


Gumbel distribution  
For trivial   and with   either finite or infinite, the limiting distribution converges if and only if
  for all  
with
 
Possible sequences here are
 
and
 


Weibull distribution  
For strictly negative   the limiting distribution converges if and only if
  (is finite)
and
  for all  
Note that for this case the exponential term   is strictly positive, since   is strictly negative.
Possible sequences here are
 
and
 


Note that the second formula (the Gumbel distribution) is the limit of the first (the Fréchet distribution) as   goes to zero.

Examples edit

Fréchet distribution edit

The Cauchy distribution's density function is:

 

and its cumulative distribution function is:

 

A little bit of calculus show that the right tail's cumulative distribution   is asymptotic to   or

 

so we have

 

Thus we have

 

and letting   (and skipping some explanation)

 

for any   The expected maximum value therefore goes up linearly with n .

Gumbel distribution edit

Let us take the normal distribution with cumulative distribution function

 

We have

 

and thus

 

Hence we have

 

If we define   as the value that exactly satisfies

 

then around  

 

As   increases, this becomes a good approximation for a wider and wider range of   so letting   we find that

 

Equivalently,

 

With this result, we see retrospectively that we need   and then

 

so the maximum is expected to climb toward infinity ever more slowly.

Weibull distribution edit

We may take the simplest example, a uniform distribution between 0 and 1, with cumulative distribution function

  for any x value from 0 to 1 .

For values of   we have

 

So for   we have

 

Let   and get

 

Close examination of that limit shows that the expected maximum approaches 1 in inverse proportion to n .

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ Fréchet, M. (1927). "Sur la loi de probabilité de l'écart maximum". Annales de la Société Polonaise de Mathématique. 6 (1): 93–116.
  2. ^ Fisher, R.A.; Tippett, L.H.C. (1928). "Limiting forms of the frequency distribution of the largest and smallest member of a sample". Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 24 (2): 180–190. Bibcode:1928PCPS...24..180F. doi:10.1017/s0305004100015681. S2CID 123125823.
  3. ^ a b von Mises, R. (1936). "La distribution de la plus grande de n valeurs" [The distribution of the largest of n values]. Rev. Math. Union Interbalcanique. 1 (in French): 141–160.
  4. ^ a b Falk, Michael; Marohn, Frank (1993). "von Mises conditions revisited". The Annals of Probability: 1310–1328.
  5. ^ a b c Gnedenko, B.V. (1943). "Sur la distribution limite du terme maximum d'une serie aleatoire". Annals of Mathematics. 44 (3): 423–453. doi:10.2307/1968974. JSTOR 1968974.
  6. ^ Mood, A.M. (1950). "5. Order Statistics". Introduction to the theory of statistics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. pp. 251–270.
  7. ^ a b Haan, Laurens; Ferreira, Ana (2007). Extreme Value Theory: An introduction. Springer.

Further reading edit