File talk:Wikipedia-No original research.ogg

Latest comment: 17 years ago by Macropode in topic Spoken article quality assessment

Spoken article quality assessment edit

Version reviewed: 00:31, 28 January 2007 (UTC)


Technical quality: Medium

  • Very low audio level.
  • Encoded at 96 kbps, not 48 kbps per recording guidelines. This makes the audio file larger than it needs to be for a good quality voice recording.

Clarity: High


Accuracy: High


Notes: {{{notes}}}


Help with recording issues can be obtained under "Recording assistance" here.
Information on the assessment procedure can be found on the spoken article assessment page.

Reviewed by: Macropode 10:38, 31 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Spoken article quality assessment edit

Version reviewed: 11:24, 30 March 2007 (UTC)


Technical quality: Medium

  • This recording has been encoded to Ogg Vorbis at 96 kb/s, not 48 kb/s per the recording guidelines. Reducing the "Quality" setting to minimum when encoding to Ogg Vorbis will usually achieve 48 kb/s. The result will be very little loss in voice quality, but a significant decrease in file size, which is important for ease of downloading and other reasons.
  • While the audio level is now good, the level increase has made various minor breath-on-microphone thumps and other extraneous noises throughout the recording more prominent.

Clarity: High


Accuracy: High


Notes: {{{notes}}}


Help with recording issues can be obtained under "Recording assistance" here.
Information on the assessment procedure can be found on the spoken article assessment page.

Reviewed by: Macropode 10:54, 31 March 2007 (UTC)Reply