File talk:En-Canada.ogg
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Hassocks5489 in topic Spoken article quality assessment
Spoken article quality assessment edit
Version reviewed: 12:02, 4 January 2008
Technical quality: High
- Encoded correctly as per the recording guidelines, including licence information. Excellent, sharp sound quality, with occasional variation in sound level noticeable. Occasional very slight breath-on-microphone noises on the /θ/ ("th") sound. Smooth editing with no choppiness.
Clarity: High
- Very smooth, professional-sounding recording. Pacing and pauses are appropriate. Useful descriptions of images.
Accuracy: High
- No errors noted. Narrating the table of contents and image captions, and providing extra navigation help for external links etc., are useful additions.
Notes: {{{notes}}}
Help with recording issues can be obtained under "Recording assistance" here.
Information on the assessment procedure can be found on the spoken article assessment page.
Reviewed by:
Hassocks5489 (talk) 22:16, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- A high-quality, interesting narration which complements the article well and enhances its status as a Featured Article.