Draft talk:Tasha McCauley

Latest comment: 5 months ago by RudolfoMD in topic Notability

Notability edit

I challenge with the claim that https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexkonrad/2023/11/17/these-are-the-people-that-fired-openai-ceo-sam-altman/?sh=26dd1a074ae9, which has 2 paragraphs entirely about her, does not constitute significant coverage. The article is entirely about her and the rest of the board. And it's by two Forbes staffers. Surely independent. Not to mention there's a ton more out there; OpenAI is worth ~$86 billion. Combined, that makes this decline highly inappropriate, no?

Also, looking in wp:twl, https://eds.p.ebscohost.com/eds/results?vid=0&sid=6cd8580c-5512-4aae-8091-1cf757ff7021%40redis&bquery=%252522Tasha%252520McCauley%252522&bdata=JmNsaTA9RlQmY2x2MD1ZJnR5cGU9MCZzZWFyY2hNb2RlPUFuZCZzaXRlPWVkcy1saXZlJnNjb3BlPXNpdGU%3d, I find it shows three six People (magazine) articles, three with her in the TITLE.

On the other hand, she is off the board. Adding that now. RudolfoMD (talk) 19:35, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

@HitroMilanese? RudolfoMD (talk) 19:30, 20 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
@RudolfoMD
This version of the draft does not include the sources from the People magazine that you mention above. Only Forbes one is included, however, in order to establish notability you need to demonstrate that the subject has received significant coverage in multiple published sources. If you have done that then resubmit the draft for another review. Regards. Hitro talk 11:05, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
I don't follow. I pinged you hoping that you reconsider, in light of the add'l info I provided showing notability, since your decision. Didn't mean for it trigger a defense or come off as an attack. There are now 4 articles with her name in the title in the article. They're mostly in celebrity rags I would never normally read, but AFAIK celebrity news is still news and can be reliable. RudolfoMD (talk) 01:24, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
 KylieTastic  / HitroMilanese / Anyone: How do https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexkonrad/2023/11/17/these-are-the-people-that-fired-openai-ceo-sam-altman/?sh=26dd1a074ae9, which has 2 paragraphs entirely about her, and is by two Forbes staffers, plus 5 articles with "Tasha McCauley" in the title not constitute significant coverage in multiple published sources? (I wouldn't have re-submitted it if it didn't seem like a clear-cut case.). Per wp:RSP, "There is consensus that People magazine can be a reliable source in biographies of living persons." RudolfoMD (talk) 21:20, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply