Talk:Shwapno

Article Improvement

This article has been written from a neutral point of view but a few contributors declined the submission by showing reason that the article is kind of advertising, and may be failing to satisfy WP:NCORP. Can anyone help to improve the article? M.parvage (talk) 13:48, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 11:03, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Nominator has been blocked indefinitely.

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

[[File:|140px|Logo of Shwapno ]]

Logo of Shwapno

• ... that Shwapno is the first member of GLOBALG.A.P in the retail chain of the South-East Asian zone? Source: https://www.tbsnews.net/economy/corporates/usaid-dmd-visits-shwapnos-globalgap-accredited-farmers-jashore-440154
  • Reviewed:

Created by M.parvage (talk). Self-nominated at 09:22, 24 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Shwapno; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing:
• Neutral: - Ongoing debates on the page about promo-related concerns, so I don't think this can be considered neutral.
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook eligibility:

• Cited:
• Interesting: - I don't think it's that interesting, personally. Do you have any other potential hooks?
• Other problems: - The grammar on the hook would need improvement as well (the "in the retail chain of the South-East Asian zone" part is not grammatically correct).

Image eligibility:

• Freely licensed: - Appears to be a corporate logo just taken from the company's website, and therefore it would be copyrighted and not free. It also definitely meets the threshold of originality. I've marked it for deletion on Commons as such.
• Used in article:
• Clear at 100px:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: @M.parvage: The NPOV concerns, at the very least, need to be dealt with before promotion.

This is my first DYK review, so hopefully I haven't messed anything up horribly. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 01:16, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Pinging nominator M.parvage for their response. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 12:52, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Awards and recognition

User:Scope creep was removed the part of Awards and recognition from Article, and claimed that "They are not award and they not honours. None of them are", Where everywhere it was cleared that all are award.--PARVAGE ^talk! 05:14, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

@M.parvage: I going to start issuing warnings against if you put these non-notable awards back. Superbrands is a survey company and is not an award. The rest are corporate awards that are non-notable. Corporate awards are mostly non-notable. Don't put them back. scope_creep^Talk 05:42, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

@M.parvage: Corporate awards are very rarely notable as they handed out like water. They are a way of building relationships and very rarely signify excellence. But you know that already. You have been here since time began. Why did you put them in the first place? All it does it reduce what is otherwise a good quality article. scope_creep^Talk 05:48, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

So, it should be merged with history instead of removing. Isn't it! PARVAGE ^talk! 05:56, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

@M.parvage: I thought your were somebody else and I see your a novice editor. Most awards are non-notable. An award must have article on Wikipedia to be acceptable as notable, particularly if it is an industry award. Awards tha come from companies are generally non-notable. They are handed out like water and there is millions of them, making them all non-notable. Military and medical awards are generally notable and can be put in if the article isn't present on Wikipedia as its assumed that these types of awards are much more carefully designed and award, making them notable, with the expectation that there will be an article at some point in the future. No don't put them in. They are junk and all but meaningless. And of course, non-notable. scope_creep^Talk 10:46, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. PARVAGE ^talk! 10:52, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Products and services

Products and services section has been removed from the article by showing reason that, this is promotional. But where was clearly mentioned that, Shwapno aimd to provide services for low income people. And citation added.