Draft talk:Innova Market Insights

WikiProject iconIntelligence Agency (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Intelligence Agency, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.


WikiProject iconBusiness Draft‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
DraftThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconDatabase analysis (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Database analysis, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
WikiProject iconDatabases NA‑class (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Databases, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
NAThis article has been rated as NA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconFood and drink Draft‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
DraftThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Food and Drink task list:
To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:
Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.
WikiProject iconNetherlands Draft‑class
WikiProject iconThis page falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.
DraftThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Clarification on draft rejection: Advertising edit

Thank you to @Greenman for taking the time to review my draft. Sorry it didn't come up to standard. I'm attempting to rectify that. One thing flagged was the submission "appears to read like an advertisement". It's this I need some help with. Are you able to be clearer on what leads you to that conclusion? I attempted to be cold and factual with the submission, avoiding anything that could be regarded as sales/marketing/advertising. In order that I can remove all hint of advertising from the submission, could you be more specific about where I've gone wrong please? I'm only interested in this fitting Wikipedia's requirements rather than dragging anyone into a debate over it, so rest assured this is a genuine request for education. Thank you again for reviewing the draft. Really appreciate it. PageSJ (talk) 10:39, 13 April 2023 (UTC)Reply