WikiProject iconCats Draft‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Cats. This project provides a central approach to Cat-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
DraftThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconAlternative Views Draft‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.
DraftThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconEcology NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.
NAThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This is not an encyclopedia article or encyclopedic subject, but an improper mix of two we already have edit

This is someone's rather strange attempt to commingle completely unrelated topics into their own personally made-up notion of "cat–human conflict". The first is cat predation on wildlife, which is already its own article, and the second is feline zoonosis, which is also already its own article. So, this is a WP:POVFORK combined with WP:COATRACKing, based on the original-research notion that these two things are closely related. Worse, the content in there so far is just rehash of the fringe editorial draft at Draft:Cat predation on islands.

Any sources used in here should be merged to the other draft, then this page deleted. Then, there should be a discussion at Talk:Cat predation on wildlife about which sources in that combined draft can be used at that actual article, for what, and well within due-weight policy, no-original-research policy, and exceptional-claims policy. Then delete the other draft. Neither of these drafts can possibly make viable stand-alone articles.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  20:25, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply