Draft talk:Eshan Arya
 | This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because this person is real and the information is educative, not a hoax. No information provided is vandalism, instead it is based on facts, and useful contribution for general information.
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because... (it provides factual information about a real person, sourced from reliable references. The content is positive or neutral, and there's no evidence of a hoax. Any minor issues can be improved through editing.) --Ichishaneichi (talk) 04:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because... (the article does not meet the necessary criteria for such a decision. Specifically, the article contains significant content that establishes context and notability of the subject, which contradicts criteria such as A1 (no context) and A3 (no content). Additionally, the article is not promotional in nature (G11), and does not consist of vandalism, nonsense, or hoaxes (G1, G3). The subject of the article is notable and verifiable, and there is potential for further improvement and expansion to meet Wikipedia’s standards. ) --PrudenceVaccine (talk) 04:30, 21 May 2024 (UTC)