Draft talk:CARiD.com

Sources

I'd love to get direct feedback on sources that should be added or removed @CharlieMehta. I've made some more updates. If you have any other suggestions, I'd love to work on getting the first draft published this weekend. Prts-fan (talk) 20:15, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

@Prts-fan Here's what I suggest: look for citations from the WP:RSP list. If you find any, add them. It's good to include as many relevant citations from that list as you can. Make sure these citations provide detailed, independent information about the subject. Avoid using interviews. Charlie (talk) 03:08, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Keep in mind that the reviewer's interpretation of the subject's notability based on these citations will be the deciding factor. However, it's still worth trying and can be a positive step forward. Charlie (talk) 03:12, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

@CharlieMehta, thanks for the feedback. I've updated the citations to include places like Better Business Bureau and updated the page overall to remove ambiguity on the company name. I also added some competitors so it's not one-sided and created an infobox so it's easy to read quickly about the company. Because it's a private company now and was private before going public through SPAC, it's challenging to find additional publicly available information from Wikipedia:Reliable sources and I'd like to get this published for now, as I think it's significant and way more than 0 before, and then add more as more information is found. Prts-fan (talk) 16:11, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Company Name

@Dan arndt I've reverted your change of the page because the draft was going to Carid but that is not the business name. Please see the BBB citation. If you are trying to do something like make room for a different variation, then please let me know. In the meantime, I've moved the draft back to its original location. Prts-fan (talk) 15:49, 7 August 2024 (UTC)