Draft talk:Alan Pemberton
Latest comment: 29 days ago by Simple1Simon2 in topic Copyright issues
 | This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright issues
editEveripedia is licensed under a compatible cc-by-4.0 license, so I have added that at the bottom.
The editor states that material was copied from these two pages:
- https://theburlingtonfiles.org/news_2022.10.31.php
- https://theburlingtonfiles.org/news_2020.01.07.php — Diannaa (talk) 12:41, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- To Whom It May Concern
- I believe all these copyright issues have now been completely dealt with (as explained in Citation 1 and my Talk Messages to Diannaa). Can you therefore kindly remove the comments above about copyright issues?
- As I have already reported, TheBurlingtonFiles.org has made the changes they promised to the two webpages referred to above and in Citation 1 and stated on each of those web-pages that The content on this webpage is released under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- I understood from Diannaa that the identification of material copied from Everipedia (IQ.wiki) was unnecessary and that as TheBurlingtonFiles article entitled Alan Pemberton https://theburlingtonfiles.org/news_2020.01.07.php was ad verbatim identical to the earlier Everipedia (now IQ.wiki) article Alan Pemberton there was no need to identify extracts from that in my Wikipedia article. If i got this wrong then I can easily correct it (as my Word app identifies any similarities with other published material).
- Regarding the other article https://theburlingtonfiles.org/news_2022.10.31.php on TheBurlingtonFiles website about Pemberton's People, as explained in Citation 1, I wrote: "This article has also been based to a lesser degree on certain facts included in another article on TheBurlingtonFiles.org website about Pemberton’s People at https://theburlingtonfiles.org/news_2022.10.31.php for which TheBurlingtonFiles.org has also granted a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. There are only a few paragraphs in this article containing text which is broadly similar enough to that in the article entitled Pemberton's People to warrant identification. Each of those paragraphs herein has been prefaced with ##."
- If you need me to do anything else please let me know. Kind regards Simple1Simon2 Simple1Simon2 (talk) 17:57, 29 May 2024 (UTC)