Wikipedia

Draft:Vahika

  • Comment: This draft has information that is not in the article and should be added to the article. Please compare and combine the draft and the article.
    You may ask for advice about comparing and combining a draft and an article at the Teahouse. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:01, 24 May 2024 (UTC)


Vahika also referred to as Bahika was an ancient region of Punjab centered between the Indus and the Sutlej rivers.[1] It was inhabited by various Indo-aryan tribes and kingdoms such as the Madra and Uśīnara with its main capital located in Sagala, modern day Sialkot.[2] The region has been attested to by numerous authors such as Pāṇini and Patanjali in the late Iron age and further by Greek writers. Vahika is not to be confused with the etymologically similar sounding Bahlika also known as Vahlika which referred to Bactria, located in modern day Northern Afghanistan and Tajikistan.[3][4]

Vahika (Bahika)
6th century BCE
CapitalSagala
GovernmentRepublic
History 
• Established
6th century BCE

Geography

edit

According to the Karna Parva, Vahika was referred to the area between the Indus and the Sutlej rivers and is referred to by Patanjali as Vahikagrama, located in modern day Punjab. They were further referred to as Jarttikas and also as Arattas.[5] The core Janapadas of the region included the Madra, Kekaya and Uśīnara in which a further tribal republic noted as the Savasa were also located in the area. The Savasa were described as residing between the Jhelum and Chenab Rivers in the north with their capital in Taxila as noted in the Divyavadana whilst the Kekaya resided in the South. The nearby Madras resided between the Chenab and Ravi Rivers in the north whilst the Usinaras were located in the south and are stated to have been associated with the neighbouring Sivi Kingdom who’s capital was centred in Shorkot.[6]

The Udichya region was another region mentioned in ancient texts and is noted by Pāṇini as comprising both the regions of Vahika and Gandhara.[7]

History

edit

The first mention of the Vahikas comes from the Gandharan grammarian Pāṇini in which he describes the region as a territory of Sanghas which denotes a republic from of government. He then further describes the ruling class of the Vahika republics with some dominated by Brahmins and others of ‘Rajanyas’ otherwise known as Kshatriyas.[8] In some Sutras they are recounted as a cradle of martial tribes who's way of life consisted of the military arts.[9] Numerous cities lying in the Vahika country are mentioned by Panini including: Kastira, Sagala, Saubhuta, Kaukudivaha, Svavidgarta, Srigalagarta and Vrikagarta.[10]

Alexander's invasion

edit

Taxiles

edit

In the 5th century BCE, the sovereign of Taxila, Omphis, formed an alliance with Alexander, motivated by a longstanding animosity towards Porus who governed the region encompassed by the Chenab and Jhelum River.[11] Omphis, in a gesture of goodwill, presented Alexander the great with significant gifts, esteemed among the Indian populace, and subsequently accompanied him on the expedition crossing the Indus.[12] His territory stretched from between the Indus and Jhelum Rivers.[13]

Porus

edit

Porus ruled over the tracts between the Hydaspes river and Chenab River and Strabo noted his territory to contain almost three hundred cities whilst also describing his land as fertile and extensive.[14] He is most notable for opposing Alexander in the Battle of the Hydaspes which proved to be one of Alexander the Great's most challenging battles. After his defeat, when asked by Alexander how he wished to be treated, Porus replied "Treat me as a king would treat another king".[15] Impressed, Alexander indeed treated him like a king, allowing him to retain his lands. Following the battle, Alexander founded two cities called Boukephala and Nikaia, the latter at the site of the battle and named after the Greek for Victory, in commemoration of his success, and the former on the opposite bank to honour his faithful steed Bucephalus, who died during or after the battle.

Cathaeans

edit

Following Alexander's battle with Porus, the Greeks had recieved information of a tribe known as the Cathaeans preparing for war alongside neighbouring tribes and who were considering taking battle in Sagala, modern day Sialkot. Arrian states that the Cathaeans were skillfull in war and were known to Porus after having sucessfully defeated him previously.[16] Arrian further states that the Cathaeans and other allied tribes had prepared themselves infront of the city upon a hill and after having been defeated encamped themselves in the city leading to a siege and later their eventual defeat.[17]

Strabo describes the culture of the Cathaeans in which they were prized for having beautiful horses and dogs and for choosing the 'handsomest person' as king. The marriage customs were also noted as peculiar to the Cathaeans in that the bride and groom chose their spouse, recounted as the law of the land.[18]

Phraotes

edit

In the 1st century CE, Phraotes, a Greek-speaking king of the city of Taxila, was met by the philosopher Apollonius of Tyana dated approximately to 46 CE, according to the Life of Apollonius Tyana written by Philostratus. The king who fits this date is Sases who is also the nephew of the Apracharaja, Aspavarma, and whose coinage has been dated to between 40-78 CE.[19] Apollionus describes the king as an Indian.[20]

He describe Phraotes' residence, Taxila, as being the same size as Nineveh, being walled like a Greek city whilst also being shaped with Narrow roads,[21][22] and further describe Phraotes kingdom as containing the old territory of Porus which spanned between the Jhelum and Chenab Rivers.[23] Following an exchange with the king, Phraotes is reported to have subsidized both barbarians and neighboring states, with the objective of averting incursions into his kingdom.[24] Phraotes also recounts that his father, being the son of a king, had become an orphan from a young age. In accordance with Indian customs, two of his relatives assumed responsibility for his upbringing until they were killed by rebellious nobles during a ritualistic ceremony along the Indus River.[25] This event led to the usurpation of the throne, compelling Phraotes' father to seek refuge with the king situated beyond the Hydaspes River, in modern-day Punjab, a ruler esteemed greater than Phraotes' father. Moreover, Phraotes states that his father, received an education facilitated by the Brahmins upon request to the king and married the daughter of the Hydaspian king, whilst having one son that was Phraotes himself.[26] Phraotes proceeds to narrate the opportune moment he seized to reclaim his ancestral kingdom, sparked by a rebellion of the citizens of Taxila against the usurpers. With fervent support from the populace, Phraotes led a triumphant entry into the residence of the usurpers, whilst the citizens brandished torches, swords, and bows in a display of unified resistance.[27]

Tribes mentioned by Pliny

edit

During this period in the 1st century CE, Pliny the Elder notes a list of tribes in the Punjab region spanning from the lower Indus to the mountain tribes near the Hindu Kush.

After passing this island, the other side of the Indus is occupied, as we know by clear and undoubted proofs, by the Athoae, the Bolingae, the Gallitalutae, the Dimuri, the Megari, the Ardabae, the Mesae, and after them, the Uri and the Silae; beyond which last there are desert tracts, extending a distance of two hundred and fifty miles. After passing these nations, we come to the Organagae, the Abortae, the Bassuertae, and, after these last, deserts similar to those previously 'mentioned. We then come to the peoples of the Sorofages, the Arbae, the Marogomatrae, the Umbrittae, of whom there are twelve nations, each with two cities, and the Asini, a people who dwell in three cities, their capital being Bucephala, which was founded around the tomb of the horse belonging to king Alexander, which bore that name. Above these peoples there are some mountain tribes, which lie at the foot of Caucasus, the Soseadae and the Sondrae, and, after passing the Indus and going down its stream, the Samarabriae, the Sambraceni, the Bisambritae, the Orsi, the Anixeni, and the Taxilae, with a famous city, which lies on a low but level plain, the general name of the district being Amenda: there are four nations here, the Peucolaitae, the Arsagalitae, the Geretae, and the Assoi.

— Pliny the elder, Natural history

Shiladas & Gadaharas

edit

Following the downfall of the Kushan Empire in the 3rd century CE, numerous dynasties regained power in the Punjab such as that of the Shiladas and Gadaharas who ruled in central Punjab based on numesmatic evidence. They appear to have ruled successively for nearly a century before being subdued by the Kidarite Huns.[28] Of their coinage, numerous kings have been named, for instance, the Shilada coinage notes the kings Bhadra, Bacharna and Pasana whilst the Gadaharas name Peraya and Kirada.[29] These dynasties origins are not known however the Puranas note that after the fall of the Satavahana dynasty 'eight Yavana, fourteen Tushara and thirteen Murunda (Saka) chiefs ruled' though the lack of credibiliy of the Yavana chiefs rule has been acknowledged by scholars such as R. C. Majumdar.[30] These Tushara chiefs may also refer to the Little Kushans of the later Kushan empire whilst the Murunda may refer to the Western Satraps who are accredited with regaining power after the fall of the Satavahanas beginning with Rudrasena II.

Taank kingdom

edit

The Taank Kingdom was a kingdom based in Punjab, between the 7th and 9th centuries ruled by the Takkas who are identified as ancient inhabitants of Punjab.[31] The main source regarding the kingdom are the chronicles of Xuanzang as well as other Arab writers. The kingdom was located south of Kashmir and north of Sindh extending from the Indus river in the west to the Beas river in the east, centred in Sagala based on Xuanzang's description of the region.[32]

The earliest Muslim author who mentions the kingdom is a merchant named Sulaiman. He visited the area before 851 AD. In his account, the kingdom is mentioned as Táfak. In 915 AD, the Arab historian Al-Masudi mentions it as at-Tákin, referring to the hills of the Punjab region. The name is read as Tákin by Sir Henry Elliott, and also as Táfan based on Masudi.[33] The account of Sulaimān the merchant calls its king malik at-taqa and further notes that he was in good terms with the Arabs and the Rashtrakuta Empire of the Deccan.[34] Ibn Khordadbeh mentions the king of the confederacy as next in eminence to the Balhara, and Kazwini mentions a fort named Taifand, the location of which agrees with the account of the hill of Sangala.[35]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ Vishnu Varrier. India In Time Of Patanjali Baij Nath Puri BVB. According to the Mahabarat it denoted the people of the Punjab and Indus...according to the karnaparva they lived between the Sutlej and the Indus.
  2. ^ Agrawala, V. S. (1953). India as known to Panini. p. 38. and Vahika, the latter comprising Madra and Usinara.
  3. ^ Vishnu Varrier. India In Time Of Patanjali Baij Nath Puri BVB. p. 77.
  4. ^ Tarn, William Woodthorpe (2010-06-24). The Greeks in Bactria and India. Cambridge University Press. p. 125. ISBN 978-1-108-00941-6.
  5. ^ Vishnu Varrier. India In Time Of Patanjali Baij Nath Puri BVB. p. 77. Mentioned by Patanjali as Vahikagrama and were also known as Jarttikas and Arattas.
  6. ^ Agrawala, V. S. (1953). India as known to Panini. p. 53. Thus Panini names three divisions of the Vahika country, viz, Kekaya, Usinara and Madra to which is to be added the fourth division Savasa. Of these Kekaya and Savasa may be located between the Jhelum and the Chenab, the first in the south and the second in the north respectively and Madra and Usinara between the Chenab and the Ravi in the north and south respectively...In literature the Usinaras are often associated with the Sibi whose chief town Sibipura has been identified with Shorkot.
  7. ^ Agrawala, V. S. (1953). India as known to Panini. p. 38. Udichya and Prachya are the two broad divisions of the country mentioned by Panini, and these terms occur in connection with the linguistic forms known to the eastern and northern grammarians. The Udichya country included Gandhara and Vahika, the latter comprising Madra and Usinara.
  8. ^ Agrawala, V. S. (1953). India as known to Panini. p. 77. Panini specially mentions the Vahika sanghas, some dominated by Brahmanas as ruling caste, others by Rajanyas, and called Rajanyaka
  9. ^ Agrawala, V. S. (1953). India as known to Panini. p. 443. The chapter opens with a reference to such saghas in the Vahika country, the cradle-land of martial tribes who cultivated military art as a way of life.
  10. ^ Agrawala, V. S. (1953). India as known to Panini. pp. 63–73.
  11. ^ "alexander and his successors in central asia" (PDF). p. 72. The ruler of Taxila wanted to satisfy his own grudge against Porus
  12. ^ "alexander and his successors in central asia" (PDF). p. 72. Taxiles and the others came to meet him, bringing gifts reckoned of value among the Indians. They presented him with the twenty-five elephants....and when they reached the Indus, they were to make all necessary preparations for the passage of the army. Taxiles and the other chiefs marched with them.
  13. ^ Sastri, K. a Nilakanta (1957). Comprehensive History Of India Vol.2 (mauryas And Satavahanas). p. 1. Here he had to depend upon and appoint Indians as his satraps, viz., Ambhi, king of Taxila, to rule from the Indus to the Hydaspes (Jhelum).
  14. ^ "ALEXANDER AND HIS SUCCESSORS IN CENTRAL ASIA" (PDF). p. 81.
  15. ^ Rogers, p.200
  16. ^ Arrian, Chinnock (1884). The Anabasis Of Alexander. p. 301. Meantime he received information that the tribe called Cathaeans and some other tribes of the independent Indians were preparing for battle...He was also informed that the city, Sangala by name,' near which they were thinking of having the struggle... The Cathaeans themselves were considered very daring and skilful in war... For a short time before it happened that Porus and Abisares had marched against them with their own forces and had roused many other tribes of the independent Indians to arms, but were forced to retreat without effecting anything worthy of the preparations they had made.
  17. ^ Arrian, Chinnock (1884). The Anabasis Of Alexander. pp. 301–304.
  18. ^ "The Geography of Strabo". As for Cathaea, a most novel regard for beauty there is reported; I mean that it is prized in an exceptional manner, as, for example, for the beauty of its horses and dogs; and, in fact, Onesicritus says that they choose the handsomest person as king... The following too is reported as a custom peculiar to the Cathaeans: the groom and bride choose one another themselves, and wives are burned up with their deceased husbands for a reason of this kind
  19. ^ Rienjang, Wannaporn; Stewart, Peter (2018-03-14). Problems of Chronology in Gandhāran Art: Proceedings of the First International Workshop of the Gandhāra Connections Project, University of Oxford, 23rd-24th March, 2017. Archaeopress. pp. 16–17. ISBN 978-1-78491-855-2.
  20. ^ De Beauvoir Priaulx, Osmond (1860). "The Indian Travels of Apollonius of Tyana". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland. 17: 76. ISSN 0035-869X. JSTOR 25581224. Tho Indus passed, their new guide led them straight to Taxila, where was the palace of the Indian king.
  21. ^ De Beauvoir Priaulx, Osmond (1860). "The Indian Travels of Apollonius of Tyana". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland. 17: 76. ISSN 0035-869X. JSTOR 25581224. Taxila was about the size of Ninovoh, walled like a Greek city
  22. ^ De Beauvoir Priaulx, Osmond (1860). "The Indian Travels of Apollonius of Tyana". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland. 17: 77. ISSN 0035-869X. JSTOR 25581224. They are taken to the palace. They found the city divided by narrow streets, well-arranged, and reminding them of Athens.
  23. ^ De Beauvoir Priaulx, Osmond (1860). "The Indian Travels of Apollonius of Tyana". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland. 17: 76. ISSN 0035-869X. JSTOR 25581224. and was the residence of a sovereign who ruled over what of old was the kingdom of Porus.
  24. ^ De Beauvoir Priaulx, Osmond (1860). "The Indian Travels of Apollonius of Tyana". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland. 17: 78. ISSN 0035-869X. JSTOR 25581224. Phraotes, in answer, said that he was moderate because his wants were few, and that as he was wealthy, he employed his wealth in doing good to his friends, and in subsidizing the barbarians, his neighbours, to prevent them from themselves ravaging, or allowing other barbarians to ravage his territories.
  25. ^ De Beauvoir Priaulx, Osmond (1860). "The Indian Travels of Apollonius of Tyana". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland. 17: 81. ISSN 0035-869X. JSTOR 25581224. The king then told how his father, the son of a king, had been left very young an orphan; and how during his minority two of his relatives according to Indian custom acted as regents, but with so little regard to law, that some nobles conspired against them, and slow them as they were sacrificing to the Indus, and seized upon the government
  26. ^ De Beauvoir Priaulx, Osmond (1860). "The Indian Travels of Apollonius of Tyana". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland. 17: 81. ISSN 0035-869X. JSTOR 25581224. How on this his father, then sixteen years of age, fled to the king beyond the Hydaspes, a greater king than himself, who received him kindly... he requested to be sent to the Brahmans; and how the Brahmans educated him; and how in time he married the daughter of the Hydaspian king, and received with her seven villages as pin-money, and had issue one son, himself, Phraotes.
  27. ^ De Beauvoir Priaulx, Osmond (1860). "The Indian Travels of Apollonius of Tyana". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland. 17: 81. ISSN 0035-869X. JSTOR 25581224. When I crossed the Hydraotis, I heard that, of the usurpers, one was already dead, and the other besieged in this very palace; so I hurried on, proclaiming to the villages I passed through who I was, and what were my rights : and the people received me gladly; and declaring I was tho very picture of my father and grandfather, they accompanied me, many of them armed with swords and bows, and our numbers increased daily ; and when we reached this city, the inhabitants, with torches lit at the altar of the Sun, and singing the praises of my father and grandfather, came out and welcomed me, and brought me hither.
  28. ^ Majumdar, Ramesh Chandra; Altekar, Anant Sadashiv (1954). Vakataka Gupta age (Circa 200-550 A.D.). pp. 18–19. The numismatic evidence shows that the Shlladas and the Gadaharas were holding sway over line Central Punjab at this time.
  29. ^ Majumdar, Ramesh Chandra; Altekar, Anant Sadashiv (1954). Vakataka Gupta age (Circa 200-550 A.D.). p. 21. Kings Bhadra Bacharna and Pasana of the former dynasty and Peraya and Kirada of the latter are known from coins. There may have been other rulers as well, Whose coins may not have come down to us. Both these dynasties were ruling in the Central Punjab down to the days of Samudragupta
  30. ^ Majumdar, Ramesh Chandra; Altekar, Anant Sadashiv (1954). Vakataka Gupta age (Circa 200-550 A.D.). p. 21. From dthe Puranas we learn that 8 Yavana 14 Tushara and 13 Murundu chiefs ruled, presumably in the Punjab, after the fall of the Andhras. It would appear that tlie Puranik writers had the Shaka, Shilada and Gadahara dynasties in view when they wrote this account. It appears strange that the Puranas should have described one of these dynasties as Yavana; Greek rule bad become extinct long ago. It is however likely that the term may be referring to the tribe Jouan-Jouan of the Chinese writers who were threatening the Kushans in c. 320 AD.
  31. ^ The Panjab Past and Present. Department of Punjab Historical Studies, Punjabi University. 1977. p. 9. Aurel Stein and Cunningham both agree in identifying Takkas with Madras or Bahikas of Mahabharata - both being the ancient inhabitants of the Punjab. In the lexicon of Hemacandra also, the Bahikas are said to be the same as Takkas.
  32. ^ CUNNINGHAM, Sir Alexander (1871). The Ancient Geography of India. I. The Buddhist Period, Including the Campaigns of Alexander, and the Travels of Hwen-Thsang ... With Thirteen Maps. Trübner&Company. p. 149.
  33. ^ CUNNINGHAM, Sir Alexander (1871). The Ancient Geography of India. I. The Buddhist Period, Including the Campaigns of Alexander, and the Travels of Hwen-Thsang ... With Thirteen Maps. Trübner&Company. p. 150.
  34. ^ Wink, André (2002), "The Mahārājas of India", Al-Hind: Early medieval India and the expansion of Islam, 7th-11th centuries, vol. 1, Brill, pp. 219–358, doi:10.1163/9789004483002_009, ISBN 978-90-04-48300-2
  35. ^ CUNNINGHAM, Sir Alexander (1871). The Ancient Geography of India. I. The Buddhist Period, Including the Campaigns of Alexander, and the Travels of Hwen-Thsang ... With Thirteen Maps. Trübner&Company. p. 152.

Sources

edit
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Vahika&oldid=1226934252"