| Submission declined on 26 January 2024 by Cabrils (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 25 January 2024 by Idoghor Melody (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Idoghor Melody 3 months ago. | |
Comment: Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, WP:JUDGE) but presently it is not clear that it does. As other reviewers have noted, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles ‘Your First Article’, ‘Referencing for Beginners’ and ‘Easier Referencing for Beginners’. Please note that the single(!) reference is not formatted correctly (see Introduction to referencing with VisualEditor and Wikipedia’s Manual of Style for help). Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being paid, you have a conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements, then please make the necessary amendments before resubmitting the page. You may also wish to leave a note for me on my talk page and I would be happy to reassess. Cabrils (talk) 01:22, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Jennifer E. Siegel is a special trial judge of the United States Tax Court.
Education edit
Siegel graduated from Barnard College where she earned a B.A. She then received an M.B.A. from the Drucker School of Management at Claremont Graduate University, a J.D. from the University of San Francisco School of Law, and an LL.M. in Taxation from New York University School of Law.
Career edit
After working in private practice and as a certified mediator, Siegel began her career with the United States Tax Court as Attorney-Adviser to Special Trial Judge Robert N. Armen, Jr. in 2006. She transitioned to an Assistant Deputy Counsel to the Chief Judge (2009-2017), Deputy Clerk of the Court (2017-2019), and Public Affairs Counsel (2019-2023). She was appointed Special Trial Judge of the United States Tax Court on September 11, 2023.
References edit
Material on this page was adapted from the website of the United States Tax Court, which is published by a United States government agency and is therefore in the public domain.