Submission declined on 12 February 2024 by Stuartyeates (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 30 December 2023 by MicrobiologyMarcus (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by MicrobiologyMarcus 4 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 6 November 2023 by Qcne (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Qcne 6 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 3 November 2023 by KylieTastic (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by KylieTastic 6 months ago.
| |
Comment: I'd recommend switching to using inline citations, generated using the citation tool. This shows reviewers and readers what sections of the article each citation is referencing. Lewcm Talk to me! 08:33, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
SARD Anti-Cheat is an anti-cheat solution designed to prevent cheating and hacking in PC games. It combines kernel-level security measures with artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) modules. The SARD system includes traffic encryption and server-side validation, meanwhile provides real-time monitoring and reporting to the client. SARD is compatible with most game engines and applications.[1]
History edit
The story of SARD Anti-Cheat began within "Frost Security", an in-house team of Innova, focused on cybersecurity solutions for games.[2] In 2020, SARD Anti-Cheat emerged as a separate entity, enhancing its kernel-based approach with AI and ML components. [3] In 2022, SARD was introduced to the independent game market, and in 2023, it has been implemented in over 10 games globally. The core team of SARD Anti-Cheat holds the rights to the intellectual property of Frost Security.
Games Monitored edit
SARD Anti-Cheat is implemented in the protection of over 10 online games internationally, including titles such as Ragnarok Online, Ragnarok Landverse[4], Lineage, and Point Blank.
References edit
- https://www.pcgamingwiki.com/wiki/SARD_Anti-Cheat
- https://startupcentraleurasia.com/news/92?slug=Armenian-SARD-Anti-Cheat-introduces-its-solutions-at-Gamescom
- https://hackernoon.com/introducing-sard-the-new-ai-empowered-anti-cheat-solution-for-fair-gaming
- https://bizcommunity.gamescom.global/event/devcom-developer-conference-2023/exhibitor/RXhoaWJpdG9yXzEzMTM3OTI=
- https://www.g2.com/products/sard-anti-cheat/reviews
- https://www.sard.ac
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.