Submission rejected on 2 November 2023 by M4V3R1CK32 (talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by M4V3R1CK32 12 months ago. Last edited by Monkbot 36 hours ago. |
Submission declined on 25 July 2023 by Asilvering (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Asilvering 15 months ago. |
Submission declined on 2 July 2023 by Karnataka (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Karnataka 16 months ago. |
Submission declined on 26 February 2023 by Asilvering (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Asilvering 20 months ago. |
Submission declined on 6 January 2023 by Hoary (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Hoary 21 months ago. |
- Comment: I have re-reviewed the changes and maintain my position on rejecting the draft. See Talk for in-depth breakdown. M4V3R1CK32 (talk) 02:22, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Sources added since last decline do not better demonstrate notability of the subject. Subject does not meet WP:NBIO or WP:NARTIST. Repeated declines for the same reason and evidence of disruptive editing led to this rejection. M4V3R1CK32 (talk) 23:27, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: I've had to revert more comment-tampering: this (by somebody in or near Tel Aviv). Do not tamper with, or remove, others' signed comments. Hoary (talk) 12:07, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: In this edit, Rockywriter88 deleted my comment. Rockywriter88, you are told: Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. This means what it says. Hoary (talk) 21:37, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Having a book in a library does not count as "represented in the permanent collections of notable galleries". That means "the Met owns one of his pieces" not "the country's deposit library has a copy of his book". This is a relatively early-career artist. In general, wikipedia is looking for people near the end of their career, not people whose first major work came out three years ago. asilvering (talk) 05:56, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Sorry, judging by his website, I don't think you can make a notability case here, unless you can find significantly more news coverage on him (not his work), which is usually a tough ask for living artists. He only has the one book, so you can't try to argue that he's an "author" with multiple notable works. He doesn't pass WP:NARTIST #4d either, as far as I can tell. If you have evidence that he does, or you can find a lot more news coverage of him (no interviews), add that to this article and resubmit. asilvering (talk) 22:58, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Ruben van Schalm | |
---|---|
Born | Ruben van Schalm 12 May 1988 |
Nationality | Dutch |
Other names | Ruben Leitersdorf |
Occupation(s) | Photographer, Creative Director, Author |
Known for | Photography |
Ruben van Schalm.[1](Hebrew: רובן ואן שחלם[2] (born 12 May 1988) is a Dutch photographer[3] and author. His work, particularly his black-and-white photographs of the human male form and its close photographic relation to the natural world, has been recognized and exhibited internationally. He is also listed as an acknowledge photographer by the RKD - Nederlands Instituut voor Kunstgeschiedenis (Dutch Institute for Art History).[4]
Early life
editVan Schalm[5] was born in Rotterdam[6][7][8], Netherlands, and grew up in Amsterdam before moving to Tel Aviv.[citation needed]
Career and collaborations
editVan Schalm began his career in photography in 2012. His work, particularly his black-and-white[9] photographs of the human male form and its close photographic relation to the natural world, has been recognized and exhibited internationally. His publication, Paradise, is included in the Rijksmuseum Research Library in Amsterdam.[10][11].The book, a limited edition of 500 copies, depicts a place overruled by the elements of nature with man at its center. It includes black & white and color images from series that van Schalm has made in the Philippines, French Polynesia, and Israel.[10] The book has received favorable reviews.[12][13][14][15][16]
Van Schalm's collaborations further underline his standing in the artistic field. He has worked with internationally recognized photographers such as Erwin Olaf[17] and Christopher Makos[18][19] , underlining his recognition within the artistic community and his contributions to the field.
Museums Collections
editVan Schalm's work is included in the collections of several institutions, including:
- The MA-g The Museum of Avant Garde, Switzerland, CH [20]
Exhibitions
editVan Schalm's work has been exhibited in various venues, including:
- 2023: Kahmann Gallery - Art Fair: Kunstrai Amsterdam, The Netherlands.[21]
- 2023: The Little Black Gallery London - Group Exhibition: BOYS! BOYS! BOYS! Sydney, Australia.[22]
- 2023: Haute Photographie - Art Fair: Rotterdam, Netherlands.[23]
- 2022: Kahmann Gallery - Group Exhibition: The Future Is Here Amsterdam, Netherlands.[24]
- 2022: Haute Photographie - Art Fair: Amsterdam, Netherlands. Museum Square Amsterdam[25]
- 2022: Haute Photographie - Art Fair: Rotterdam, Netherlands. Keilehaven[26]
Publications
edit- Van Schalm, Ruben (2020). Paradise. Komma. ISBN 978-9491525919.[27]
- Pascal, Ghislain (2020). BOYS! BOYS! BOYS!. TeNeues & MENDO. ISBN 9783961712526.[29]
- Dutch, Photography (2020). New Gup 2020. Xpublishers. ISBN 978-9491525919.[30]
- Pascal, Ghislain (2023). BOYS! BOYS! BOYS!. Kehrer verlag. ISBN 9783969001141.[31] [32]
References
edit- ^ Redactie Winq. "Uit de kunst". WinQ NL.
- ^ Eldovi, Tomer. ""הקורונה עוזרת לי להעריך עוד יותר את מה שכבר הערכתי כל חיי"". Mako (in Hebrew).
- ^ Team, Gayety (28 August 2024). "Capturing Vulnerability and Strength in Nature Through Fine Art Photography". Gayety. Retrieved 29 August 2024.
- ^ "Ontdek fotograaf Ruben van Schalm". rkd.nl.
- ^ Photographie, L'Œil de la (18 May 2024). "Ruben van Schalm". The Eye of Photography Magazine. Retrieved 5 September 2024.
- ^ "Ruben van Schalm". The Independent Photographer. 21 October 2022. Retrieved 5 September 2024.
- ^ "Oud Hellevoeter Ruben van Schalm toont nieuw werk". www.groothellevoet.nl (in Dutch). 21 January 2023. Retrieved 5 September 2024.
- ^ "RKD Research". research.rkd.nl. Retrieved 5 September 2024.
- ^ "Artdoc Photography Magazine" (PDF).
- ^ a b Paradise - Ruben van Schalm. Rijksmuseum Research Library. 2020. ISBN 9789491525919. OCLC 1143479120.
- ^ Schalm, Ruben van (2020). Paradise - Rijksmuseum Research Library. Komma, d'jonge Hond. ISBN 9789491525919. OCLC 1143479120. Retrieved 24 July 2023.
- ^ "Ruben van Schalm : Paradise - The Eye of Photography Magazine". 9 March 2020. Retrieved 24 July 2023.
- ^ "Ruben van Schalm - Paradise — ARTIBOOKS". Retrieved 24 July 2023.
- ^ Hendriks, Ton. "Fotoboek Paradise van Ruben van Schalm". PF. Retrieved 24 July 2023.
- ^ The eyes of photography. "Ruben van Schalm Paradise". Loeidelaphotographie. Retrieved 24 July 2023.
- ^ Phearse, Terrence. "Paradise: Ruben van Schalm". Musee Magazine. Retrieved 24 July 2023.
- ^ "Foreword Paradise - Erwin Olaf" (PDF). Retrieved 24 July 2023.
- ^ "Christopher Makos - BFA". Retrieved 24 July 2023.
- ^ "Art Magazine - Museum Brandhorst" (PDF).
- ^ "Ruben van Schalm - MA-g". www.ma-g.org. Retrieved 25 August 2024.
- ^ Rai, Kunst. "Ruben van Schalm". Kunsrai. Retrieved 24 July 2023.
- ^ Photographie, Loeildela. "BOYS! BOYS! BOYS! At World Pride 2023". The eye of Photography. Retrieved 24 July 2023.
- ^ Groot, Hellevoet. "Oud Hellevoeter Ruben van Schalm toont nieuw werk". Groot Hellevoet. Retrieved 24 July 2023.
- ^ I, Amsterdam (25 November 2022). "See and do | whats on | exhibitions". I Amsterdam. Retrieved 24 July 2023.
- ^ Artsy. "haute photographie amsterdam". artsy. Retrieved 24 July 2023.
- ^ Ganitta, Cornelia. "Rückblick Auf die Haute Photographie in Rotterdam". Art Benelux. Retrieved 2 June 2022.
- ^ van Schalm, Ruben (2020). Paradise (500 ed.). The Netherlands: Komma. ISBN 9789491525919.
- ^ van Schalm, Ruben (2020). Paradise. Washington, DC: The Library of Congress. ISBN 9789491525919.
- ^ Pascal, Ghislain (2020). BOYS! BOYS! BOYS!. TeNeues & MENDO. p. 224. ISBN 9783961712526.
- ^ Dutch Photography, New (2020). Gup New 2020. Xpublishers. ISBN 9789083031118.
- ^ VERLAG, KEHRER. "BOYS! BOYS! BOYS!" (PDF). CATALOGUE KEHRER SPRING 2023. pp. 18–19.
- ^ "BOYS! BOYS! BOYS! | Fotografiska New York". newyork.fotografiska.com. Retrieved 25 August 2024.
External links
edit- Studio Ruben van Schalm, official website
- LensCulture
- Photography Now
- The Little Black Gallery London - BOYS! BOYS! BOYS!