Religion as the hypernym of all metaphysical worldviews edit
Religion, as a concept, has often been considered as the hypernym of all metaphysical worldviews. However, it is important to note that not all metaphysical worldviews are religious in nature. Some metaphysical worldviews do not include the supernatural and are not rooted in any religious beliefs.
Logical physicalism, also known as metaphysical logicism or metaphysical naturalism, is an example of a metaphysical worldview that does not incorporate causal violations or supernatural elements. It focuses on the belief that the natural world and its processes can be understood through logical and scientific means. This worldview does not align with religious beliefs that involve supernatural entities or events.
It is crucial to acknowledge that the supernatural, while often unknowable, does not meet the axiomatic prerequisites for physical foundations. If it did, it would be a part of a different branch of physics altogether. Therefore, considering religion as the hypernym for all metaphysical worldviews becomes problematic as it fails to encompass non-religious metaphysical perspectives.
While the term "philosophical belief" may seem broad enough to encompass metaphysical worldviews, it is important to note that philosophy encompasses a wide range of topics that are not directly related to metaphysical worldviews. This makes it an inadequate hypernym for the concept at hand.
It is also worth mentioning that not everyone prioritizes or even cares about metaphysics or worldviews. Some individuals may not give significant consideration to the first principles of things or the general stance or attitude towards life. Thus, it is essential to find a hypernym that is neither too narrow nor too wide to encompass metaphysical worldviews adequately.
It is important to recognize that applying strict rules of set theory in sociology may not always be appropriate or effective. While metaphysical indifferents may not hold any particular metaphysical worldview, it is crucial to select the most suitable hypernym that represents the range of metaphysical perspectives. Agnostics, who remain open to alternatives, can be seen as having a metaphysical worldview, albeit one that is open and non-committal.
In conclusion, religion cannot be considered as the hypernym for all metaphysical worldviews. It would be unethical to misrepresent the population by using false and biased hypernymization to promote a specific opinion as the correct one. It is essential to approach the topic with an open mind, respecting the diversity of metaphysical perspectives and avoiding the imposition of a single label that does not accurately represent the breadth of thought within this field.