Draft:National Institute for the Psychotherapies

Submission declined on 9 June 2024 by Mgp28 (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by Mgp28 2 months ago. Last edited by Aonex78 9 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Resubmit

Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 6 March 2024 by Nthep (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by Nthep 5 months ago.

Comment: An article about an organisation needs multiple (aim for at least three) published sources that meet all four criteria listed above. The sources currently present do not seem to meet these. Sources that meet these criteria will have to be added before this article can be accepted.
My reasons for feeling that the current sources are insufficient are:
#1 is a job search website and would not be classified as a WP:Reliable source
#2 is written by one of the institute's founders so is not an independent source
#3 I cannot access all of this source so I may be mistaken but from Google books it appears that this statement is attributed to the author contributions section at the beginning of the book, and is not in-depth coverage coverage of the institute.
#4 is information about a journal and not coverage of the institute. Mgp28 (talk) 17:42, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

The National Institute for the Psychotherapies (NIP) is a therapy training institute that provides education and treatment services in contemporary psychoanalysis and psychodynamic therapy. Chartered as a non-profit educational facility by the state of New York in 1972, NIP is located in New York City at 71 West 23rd Street.^[1]

History

The institute teaches multiple therapeutic approaches, a philosophy they highlighted by pluralizing the word “psychotherapies” in the institute’s name. ^[2]

Publications

The journal Psychoanalytic Perspectives includes contributors who are current or former faculty at NIP.^[3]

References

^ "National Institute for the Psychotherapies Training Institute - Emily L. Nash LCAT | Office of the Professions". www.op.nysed.gov. Retrieved 2024-08-20.
^ "National Institute for the Psychotherapies Training Institute". Retrieved August 27, 2024.
^ https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/uppe20/about-this-journal#journal-metrics. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)

[1] "National Institute for the Psychotherapies Training Institute - Emily L. Nash LCAT | Office of the Professions". www.op.nysed.gov. Retrieved 2024-08-20.

[2] "National Institute for the Psychotherapies Training Institute". Retrieved August 27, 2024.

[3] ttps://www.tandfonline.com/journals/uppe20/about-this-journal#journal-metrics. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)

[1]

[2]

[3]