| Submission declined on 2 January 2024 by Sungodtemple (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 31 December 2023 by Ratnahastin (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Ratnahastin 5 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 31 December 2023 by 94rain (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by 94rain 5 months ago. | |
Comment: No independent sources. Sungodtemple (talk • contribs) 15:20, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: See also Wikipedia:Autobiography for writing about yourself and WP:COI for declaring a conflict of interest. It likely won't qualify for an article on Wikipedia. Please consider Wikipedia:Alternative outlets. 94rain Talk 02:20, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Nathan van Clief
edit
Nathan Byington van Clief (born September 9, 2000) is an Asian-American portrait photographer of Dutch descent. van Clief was born in Novosibirsk and obtained his acquisition of American citizenship through the wedlock policy. Artistically known for his portraiture particularly of South Korean male models, which often feature subjects in thematic and intimate settings, many awe in his unique interpretation of the male soul.
References
editVan Clief, Nathan. “Portraiture.” Van Clief Photography, Nathan Van Clief, 16 Sept. 2019, vanclief.photography/. Accessed 31 Dec. 2023.
“Portraiture.” Van Clief Photography, Nathan Van Clief, 16 Sept. 2019, vanclief.photography/. Accessed 31 Dec. 2023.