| Submission declined on 20 August 2024 by Dan arndt (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 19 August 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of books). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by SafariScribe 2 months ago. | |
Comment: Still fails WP:NBOOK. Sehraby Books is a primary source and therefore not independent. YouTube, Amazon.com, and GoodReads are not acceptable or reliable independent sources either. The link on Luminous Landscape is to a subscription and therefore not verifiable. Dan arndt (talk) 07:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Doesn't meet WP:NBOOK. What we are looking for include reviews from reliable sources, awards and impacts of the book as said by the sources (newspapers, article in magazines and journals, e.t.c). Amazon, Goodreads aren't reliable; they are used to verify some important parts of a book like page numbers, ISBN identifier, and more. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:57, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
| Author | Artin Sehraby |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Series | PROJECT |
| Genre | Self Help |
| Publisher | Sehraby Books |
Publication date | 10 January 2024 |
| Publication place | United Kingdom |
| ISBN | 979-8874398774 |
Mindset: The Conquest to Mastery is a 2024 book written by Artin Sehraby and published by Sehraby Books. It was the first book in Sehraby's "PROJECT" collection.[1] [2]
Contents
editMindset: The Conquest to Mastery is a 117 page non-fiction self-help book exploring various psychological and philosophical concepts surrounding decision theory, mental states and mindsets. The book offers an introduction into Freudian Psychology alongside Stoicism and Adlerian Psychology. The book offers advice on decision theory and Sehraby provides his view on mindsets.[3]
Reception
editPopular book critic Cindy Pham reviewed the book in March 2024 commenting "with a slow start he [the author] gives solid guidance, decent overall." [4] The self-help newsletter Luminous featured the book in their April edition as "the self-help book to read this month" [5] The book received a 3.8 score on Goodreads out of a maximum of 5. [1] The book held the number 2 position on Amazon's Best Sellers list in its category from 13 to 15 January 2024. [3]
References
edit- ^ a b "Mindset: The Conquest To Mastery (PROJECT)". Goodreads. Retrieved 2024-08-19.
- ^ Sehraby, Artin (2024-01-10). PROJECT Mindset: The Conquest To Mastery. Sehraby Books.
- ^ a b "Mindset: The Conquest to Mastery". Amazon. 9 January 2024. Retrieved 19 August 2024.
- ^ "withcindy". YouTube. Retrieved 2024-08-20.
- ^ www.jasonpomerleau.com, Jason Pomerleau-. "Form Newsletter". Luminous Landscape. Retrieved 2024-08-20.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.