| Submission declined on 4 November 2023 by Oltrepier (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 15 July 2023 by Tutwakhamoe (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Tutwakhamoe 10 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 7 January 2023 by Felix QW (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Felix QW 16 months ago. | |
Comment: Try taking a look at WP:MOSFILM to see how you can improve the draft, as there are still some issues with formatting and WP:NPOV (especially in the "Description" section)... Oltrepier (talk) 15:41, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Just removing one source does not address the concern of the previous reviewer, as many claims remained unsourced. The moviemaker's own publication and Vimeo video can not be used as sources. The currently provided citations are just the subject's listing in movie sites or trivial mentions elsewhere, with some sites that did not mention the subject at all. Please make sure to add multiple significant coverage and review from independent and reliable sources to prove that the subject meets WP:NFILM, and do not write the draft in its current promotional manner. Some of the content here seem to be taken from this site and this site, rewrite or remove the texts that are marked red here. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 11:46, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Many of the statements made in the article draft are not sourced to the references provided; this includes hypotheses such as linking "Donaggio's condition of suspension" to "filmmaker Hito Steyerl's groundlessness" or statements that certain things are unclear or have never been revealed. Everything should be verifiable directly from the third-party sources provided. Felix QW (talk) 20:13, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
| Milano di Carta | |
|---|---|
| Directed by | Gianmarco Donaggio |
| Cinematography | Gianmarco Donaggio |
| Edited by | Gianmarco Donaggio |
Release date | 2021 |
Running time | 7 min |
| Country | Italy |
| Language | silent |
Milano di Carta is an Italian experimental short film created by filmmaker and artist Gianmarco Donaggio.[1][2][3] The work gained international recognition following its European release in 2021. It has been showcased at prominent international film festivals and contemporary art museums56. In January 2022, the film was selected as one of the ten representative Italian works of 2021.[4] , part of the "Panoramica 21" collection, which highlighted films noted for their cinematic experimentation and socio-cultural impact.[5] The collection was presented at an extensive exhibition featuring Italian art films at Palazzo delle esposizioni in 2022.[6]
Description edit
"Milano di Carta" is aligned with Donaggio's cinematic style, centering on the exploration of the cinematic image and its motion as its central theme. The filmmaker articulates the film experience as a dynamic encounter, a performative endeavor intended to remain independent from other artistic mediums such as literature, painting, and music9. In line with avant-garde cinema, the emphasis is placed on the viewer's experience of the work rather than the depicted subject or concept.[7]
Thematically, the film presents a series of billboards filmed across Milan. However, rather than displaying anticipated monumental paper prints, the billboards feature unexpected elements. Notably, these elements reveal themselves to be microscopic projections of the original billboard advertisements. The overlaying of image layers in the film lends itself to multifaceted interpretations. During the 5th Laterale Film Festival, an annual international event in Cosenza, "Milano di Carta" was described as follows:
"What is left of advertising when it is shred, when the game of the ephemeral on the ephemeral on advertising boards stops, tear after tear, paper after paper? Naked screens, that are not showcases anymore, that do not search for numbers, consent, or a market. The filmic act, then, consists of casting the microscopic texture of paper and its fibre on advertising boards, switching the relationship between big and small, between depth and width. The gaze radiates phosphenes, ripples. It prefers dust to figures, the unknown to dimensions, quiet sound to clamour, extension to objects. It opposes epiphany and wonder to the clarity of vision."[8]
See also edit
References edit
- ^ "Milano di Carta, by Gianmarco Donaggio | Experimental Cinema Wiki". Experimental Cinema. Retrieved 2022-10-16.
- ^ "Milano di carta - Visioni Urbane".
- ^ "Walkin studio - VIR Open Studio". walkinstudio.it. Retrieved 2022-10-04.
- ^ "Official selection of 13th Short Waves Festival – 88 short films from 31 countries in 5 competitions - Short Waves Festival". 2021-05-06. Retrieved 2022-10-01.
- ^ "PANORAMICA*21 ‹ Visualcontainer". Retrieved 2022-10-01.
- ^ "Visualcontainer@ IL VIDEO RENDE FELICI – Palazzo delle Esposizioni Roma ‹ Visualcontainer" (in Italian). Retrieved 2022-10-01.
- ^ Donaggio G., Filming as an Encounter. Hangar center for contemporary art Lisbon, 2022.
- ^ "Lateral Selection 2021". Laterale Film Festival (in Italian). Retrieved 2022-10-01.
Category:Avant-garde and experimental films Category:Italian avant-garde and experimental films