| Submission declined on 7 December 2023 by BuySomeApples (talk). This submission appears to be taken from https://www.ifilmfest.org/homeoftheheart/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
This submission has now been cleaned of the above-noted copyright violation and its history redacted by an administrator to remove the infringement. If re-submitted (and subsequent additions do not reintroduce copyright problems), the content may be assessed on other grounds.| Submission declined on 4 December 2023 by ReaderofthePack (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by ReaderofthePack 5 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 29 November 2023 by Lightoil (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Lightoil 5 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 24 November 2023 by WikiOriginal-9 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by WikiOriginal-9 5 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 23 November 2023 by Aviram7 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Aviram7 6 months ago. | |
Comment: See my notes. This is somewhat close to passing but just isn't there yet. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:04, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: A quick note about qualifying for the Oscars: this isn't really a sign of notability or even really something to mention in the article. All qualifying means is that it met the basic requirements to be in the running for the long or short list for the award. Those aren't really signs of notability so to speak so this would be more of a WP:TRIVIAL thing to mention (per Wikipedia's guidelines) and not really something I'd rely on for notability. Now if it got onto the final ballot for the Oscar for short films, that would be enough to establish notability but that's not going to be announced for a while and is kind of a long shot for any given short film (that isn't Pixar created/released, anyway). Establishing notability for short films is incredibly difficult as it has to pass the same notability guidelines used for feature length films, despite getting maybe a tenth of the coverage - if even that. This needs coverage by way of reviews and so on. The NYICFF award isn't enough to give notability on that basis alone. iFilm looks to be discerning but lacks the notability needed for the award to be considered as a notability-granting source/award. The Animation Magazine source is actually a good one and can be used to create a production/development section. However those are the only two sources that are really good and they're not really strong enough to establish notability. What is needed here would be something like a review in a reliable source. Those are pretty difficult to come by for short films, unfortunately. I highly recommend continuing to work on this as this is one of the more promising short films as far as notability goes. I don't think there's quite enough at the moment to really establish notability but there's enough to where if we had a couple more strong sources it would pass. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:04, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: I know This short animated film win more awards but these nomination and awards section are unsourced and source are only 4, so, this submission can't be accepted at this time, please add more reliable source who increase and indicates clear notability ;please see WP:NFILM. ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 16:11, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
| Home of the Heart | |
|---|---|
| Directed by | Sarah Saidan |
| Written by | Sarah Saidan and Simon Serna |
| Produced by | Jérôme Barthélemy, Daniel Sauvage, Camille Condemi |
| Starring | Saeed Mirzaei, Taha Moghani, Shahriar Sadr, Alice Lendrevie, Cécile Arnaud, Pierre-Alexis Touzeau |
| Edited by | Manon Dubois |
| Music by | Pierre Oberkampf |
Production company | Caïmans Productions |
Release date | January 29, 2022 (Clermont-Ferrand International Short Film Festival) |
Running time | 14 mn |
| Country | France |
Home of the Heart (Original title (FR): A coeur perdu) is an animated short film directed by Sarah Saidan and produced by Caïmans Productions[1]. The short has been presented and has won awards at various festivals, including New York International Children’s Film Festival[2] (2023) and iFilm Festival (2023 ), where it received the awards for Best Animated Short.[3] and Best Animated Film[4]. It was also nominated at Kraków Film Festival[5] (2022) and Anima Film Festival (2023).
References edit
- ^ "A cœur perdu – Caïmans Productions" (in French). Retrieved 2023-12-05.
- ^ "French Films at the New York Int'l Children's Film Festival – Villa Albertine". Retrieved 2023-12-04.
- ^ "Home of the Heart". New York Int'l Children's Film Festival. Retrieved 2023-11-23.
- ^ "Film 'Home of the Heart' | iFilm Festival". Retrieved 2023-11-23.
- ^ "Home of the Heart - Film of 62th KFF". Krakow Film Festival. Retrieved 2023-11-23.