Wikipedia

Draft:Global Justice Index Report

  • Comment: Entirely rests on primary sources.
    Searching for "Global Justice Index Report" on google scholar shows nothing with more than 20 citations.
    This is not what notability looks like. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:08, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Global Justice Index Report has been published annually by Chinese Political Science Review under Springer Nature since 2019.[1][2][3][4] It is created by the multiyear research project, Global Justice Index, at the Fudan Institute for Advanced Study in Social Sciences (Fudan IAS) to conceptualize and measure each country’s contribution to achieve greater global justice across the world.[5][6][7]

Based on its conceptualization and measurement of global justice, Global Justice Index Report currently provides data on ten dimensions of global justice, and quantitatively measures the performance and contribution of nation-states around the world in ten issue-areas: (1) climate change (global warming), (2) peacekeeping, (3) humanitarian aid, (4) terrorism and armed conflicts, (5) cross-national criminal police cooperation, (6) refugees, (7) anti-poverty, (8) education, (9) public health, and (10) the protection of women and children.[8][9]

Global Justice Index edit

Global Justice Index (GJI) was founded in 2018 by Professor Sujian Guo as a director’s strategic initiative of the Fudan IAS.[10] Global Justice Index study began with the conceptualization of global justice based on a theoretical paper titled “Conceptualizing and Measuring Global Justice: Theories, Concepts, Principles and Indicators,” co-authored by the project leader, Sujian Guo, published in Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences.[11]

GJI claims to make the following contributions: (1) the global justice index is arguably the first attempt to measure the performance and contribution of nation states to enhance justice at the global level; (2) it offers a reference point for those who want to track progress of global justice and study changes over time; (3) the index is a barometer for the international community to implement and monitor global justice in different issue areas, enabling international organizations and policymakers to target resources and design policies more effectively; and (4) it can be used either as an analytical tool to compare global justice issues across nations or as a dependent variable in causal analysis.[1] Given these contributions, Global Justice Index Report has been receiving growing attention from scholars in humanitarian aid[12], poverty reduction[13][14], public health[15], public policy[16], armed conflicts[17], and international relations[18][19], among other fields.

GJI Country Rankings edit

In GJI’s 2020 Index Report for 2018, the top ten countries are the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, China, Sweden, Norway, Canada, Belgium, Finland, and Italy.[2] By contrast, in GJI’s 2022 Index Report for 2020 that covers all 10 issues, the top 10 countries in the ranking are the United States, China, Germany, the UK, Sweden, France, Canada, Italy, Brazil, and India. Compared to the top 10 countries in 2018, France, Brazil, and India are new entrants to the top 10 in 2020. Of these three countries, France was not ranked for lack of data for 2010, and Brazil and India rose from the nineteenth and forty-fourth positions in 2018 to the ninth and tenth in 2020, respectively. By contrast, Norway, Finland, and Belgium dropped from the sixth, eighth, and tenth places in 2018 to the twelfth, eleventh, and fourteenth in 2020, falling out of the top 10. The bottom 10 countries are Ukraine, Estonia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Colombia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Viet Nam, and Uzbekistan. Of these seven are in Asia, two are in Europe, and one is in Latin America. The changes in global ranking should be updated annually based on the forthcoming GJI annual reports.[4]

References edit

  1. ^ a b Gu, Yanfeng; Qin, Xuan; Wang, Zhongyuan; Zhang, Chunman; Guo, Sujian (2020). "Global Justice Index Report". Chinese Political Science Review. 5 (3): 253-331. doi:10.1007/s41111-020-00148-z. S2CID 256470238.
  2. ^ a b Gu, Yanfeng; Qin, Xuan; Wang, Zhongyuan; Zhang, Chunman; Guo, Sujian (2021). "Global Justice Index Report 2020". Chinese Political Science Review. 6 (3): 322-486. doi:10.1007/s41111-021-00178-1. S2CID 233980801.
  3. ^ Gu, Yanfeng; Guo, Sujian; Qin, Xuan; Wang, Zhongyuan; Zhang, Chunman; Zhang, Tiantian (2022). "Global Justice Index Report 2021". Chinese Political Science Review. 7 (3): 322-465. doi:10.1007/s41111-022-00220-w. S2CID 251158005.
  4. ^ a b Gu, Yanfeng; Guo, Sujian; Qin, Xuan; Qu, Wen; Wang, Zhongyuan; Zhang, Tiantian (2023). "Global Justice Index Report 2022". Chinese Political Science Review. 8 (2): 133-239. doi:10.1007/s41111-023-00240-0. S2CID 258109007.
  5. ^ Guo, Sujian (2024-02-12). "What does the Global Justice Index Report say? - The Academic". theacademic.com. Retrieved 2024-02-13.
  6. ^ "Fudan IAS Global Justice Project". Global Policy. Global Policy Journal. Retrieved 5 August 2023.
  7. ^ "上海复旦大学发布《全球正义指数报告》--国际--人民网". world.people.com.cn. Retrieved 2023-08-06.
  8. ^ "The Academic on LinkedIn: What does the Global Justice Index Report say?". www.linkedin.com. Retrieved 2024-02-13.
  9. ^ "Facebook". www.facebook.com. Retrieved 2024-02-13.
  10. ^ "Chinese Political Science Review". Springer. Retrieved 2023-08-05.
  11. ^ Guo, Sujian; Lin, Xi; Coicaud, Jean-Marc; Gu, Su; Gu, Yanfeng; Liu, Qingping; Qin, Xuan; Sun, Guodong; Wang, Zhongyuan; Zhang, Chunman (2019-12-01). "Conceptualizing and Measuring Global Justice: Theories, Concepts, Principles and Indicators". Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences. 12 (4): 511–546. doi:10.1007/s40647-019-00267-1. ISSN 2198-2600. S2CID 200043964.
  12. ^ Paranata, Ade; Adha, Rishan; Thao, Hoang Thi Phuong; Sasanti, Elin Erlina; Fafurida (2023-06-01). "The Catastrophe of Corruption in the Sustainability of Foreign aid: A Prediction of Artificial Neural Network Method in Indonesia". Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences. 16 (2): 239–257. doi:10.1007/s40647-023-00367-z. ISSN 2198-2600. S2CID 257237325.
  13. ^ Zuo, Cai (Vera) (2022-06-01). "Integrating Devolution with Centralization: A Comparison of Poverty Alleviation Programs in India, Mexico, and China". Journal of Chinese Political Science. 27 (2): 247–270. doi:10.1007/s11366-021-09760-5. ISSN 1874-6357. S2CID 239630023.
  14. ^ Li, Mengyao; Wu, Zemin (2022-06-01). "Power and Poverty in China: Why Some Counties Perform Better in Poverty Alleviation?". Journal of Chinese Political Science. 27 (2): 319–340. doi:10.1007/s11366-021-09765-0. ISSN 1874-6357. S2CID 239450843.
  15. ^ Liu, Li; Wang, Yuxin; Ariyawardana, Anoma (2022-04-03). "Rebuilding milk safety trust in China: what do we learn and the way forward". Journal of Chinese Governance. 7 (2): 266–290. doi:10.1080/23812346.2021.1873609. ISSN 2381-2346. S2CID 234019227.
  16. ^ Xia, Zhiqiang; Yan, Xingyu; Yang, Xiaoyong (2022-10-02). "Research on big data-driven public services in China: a visualized bibliometric analysis". Journal of Chinese Governance. 7 (4): 531–558. doi:10.1080/23812346.2021.1947643. ISSN 2381-2346. S2CID 237809023.
  17. ^ Luo, Ji; Wang, Guijun; Li, Guangqin; Pesce, Greta (2022-05-01). "Transport infrastructure connectivity and conflict resolution: a machine learning analysis". Neural Computing and Applications. 34 (9): 6585–6601. doi:10.1007/s00521-021-06015-5. ISSN 1433-3058. S2CID 235554851.
  18. ^ Yuan, Jingdong (2023-09-01). "Forging a New Security Order in Eurasia: China, the SCO, and the Impacts on Regional Governance". Chinese Political Science Review. 8 (3): 422–439. doi:10.1007/s41111-022-00223-7. ISSN 2365-4252. S2CID 250471202.
  19. ^ Lee, Walter (2021). Principles and Laws in World Politics: Classical Chinese Perspectives on Global Conflict. World Scientific. doi:10.1142/12155. ISBN 978-981-123-213-8. Retrieved 6 August 2023.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Global_Justice_Index_Report&oldid=1207099656"