Draft:Denmark's Maritime Security Strategi in the Arctic

Denmark's Maritime Security Strategi in the Arctic
The Danish maritime security strategy aims to ensure safe and sustainable maritime activities in the Arctic region. This strategy reflects Denmark's historical identity as a seafaring nation, coupled with its pragmatic approach as a small state navigating international relations. Climate change and geopolitical interests have led to increased military activity in the Arctic region. This presents a comprehensive security challenge for Denmark, necessitating a robust maritime security strategy.

Background

edit

The Arctic Region holds paramount significance in Danish foreign and defense policy due to its territorial attachment to both the Faroe Islands and Greenland.[1] Climate changes in the Arctic have resulted in substantial ice loss, with an estimated 51,000 square kilometers of sea ice disappearing over the last five decades.[2] This phenomenon has opened [AR1] new trade routes and facilitated access to previously untapped natural resources. This has resulted in increasing international interest in the region, notably from countries such as China and Russia. For instance, Russia has increased their testing of different missile systems in the Arctic region combined with several military exercises and trainings. The Russian interest and their attempt to show dominance in the area has been underscored by Russia's symbolic act of planting a flag on the North Pole seabed.[3][4][5] Consequently, this presents a security dilemma for Denmark and underscores the imperative for a robust maritime security strategy.[6]

Maritime Security Operations (MSO)

edit

Maritime Security Operations is a term used to describe operations that extend beyond traditional naval warfare. The concept is broad and is referred to in NATO as "maritime operations other than war". This encompasses various illicit maritime activities such as piracy, terrorism, smuggling, and illegal fishing. MSO serves as a vital tool for Denmark in ensuring regional stability. It encompasses a range of tasks, all geared towards maintaining maritime stability, protecting citizens, and safeguarding national and international interests.[7] MSO holds strategic importance for Denmark as it guides the formulation of doctrines and provides direction for a significant portion of naval and coast guard tasks. While MSO is crucial for regional stability, the lack of standardized procedures may lead to diverse interpretations and differing responses among states to specific security issues. Variations in states' perceptions of security threats can result in varying responses, potentially heightening the risk of security crises[7]

edit

The strategic significance of the Arctic region necessitates Denmark's pursuit of a stronger naval presence to safeguard its interests. The Danish navy fulfills a dual role as both coast guard and navy throughout the Kingdom of Denmark, including the Faroe Islands and Greenland. This entails deploying modern military vessels capable of operating in icy waters, thereby ensuring Danish sovereignty in the face of larger powers such as Russia, China, and the United States.[8] The role of the Danish Navy extends beyond defense to encompass securing supply lines, conducting civilian and surveillance missions, and participating in international operations. Another notable aspect of Denmark's maritime security strategy is the domestic construction of military ships without EU bidding. This initiative aims to enhance security capabilities, stimulate economic growth, generate employment opportunities, and foster technological innovation within Denmark's maritime sector.[8]

International Collaboration

edit

An integral aspect of Denmark's maritime security strategy is collaboration with other Arctic nations and NATO. The escalation of military activities in the region has prompted Denmark to focus on enhancing maritime safety through increased port state control and information exchange on ship movements.[9] Denmark supports the development of binding global rules and standards for Arctic shipping within the International Maritime Organization (IMO).[9] Moreover, Denmark emphasizes the importance of international cooperation and adherence to legal principles in managing Arctic developments peacefully. The Ilulissat Declaration serves as a pivotal agreement outlining principles for maintaining a stable political environment in the Arctic. By upholding these principles, Denmark seeks to ensure a stable and cooperative approach to Arctic governance.[10] Additionally, Denmark aims to promote sustainable growth by establishing recognized shipping routes and enhancing maritime infrastructure.

Strategy Overview

edit

Denmark's response to the escalating military activity in the Arctic region is multifaceted. Historically, Denmark has advocated for maintaining low tension in the Arctic, favoring diplomatic solutions over military escalations. However, recent developments, such as heightened Russian military activities and China's growing political interest in the region, have prompted Denmark to reassess its stance.[11] Denmark has shifted towards supporting NATO involvement in the Arctic, viewing it as a necessary measure to safeguard its interests and maintain regional stability.[12] Consequently, Denmark has made significant investments in bolstering its defense capabilities, particularly in surveillance and monitoring systems.[13]

References

edit
  1. ^ "Kingdom of Denmark". The Arctic Institute - Center for Circumpolar Security Studies.
  2. ^ Team, By Maria-José Viñas, NASA's Earth Science News. "2018 Arctic summertime sea ice minimum extent tied for sixth lowest on record". Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  3. ^ Petersen, Nikolaj (2009): "The Arctic as a New Arena for Danish Foreign Policy: The Ilulissat Initiative and Its Implication". p. 35–78 in Danish Foreign Policy Yearbook 2008. Copenhagen 2009: Danish Institute for International Studies, DIIS.
  4. ^ https://pure.diis.dk/ws/files/4185554/Nye_sikkerhedspolitiske_dynamikker_i_Arktis_DIIS_rapport_2020_ed.pdf
  5. ^ Rahbek-Clemmensen, Jon (2017). "The Arctic turn - How did the High North become a foreign and security policy priority for Denmark?" P. 54–69 in Greenland and the international politics of a changing Arctic: post-colonial paradiplomacy between high and low politics, Routledge research in polar regions. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY: Routledge.
  6. ^ "Geopolitical Competition in The Arctic Circle". Harvard International Review. December 2, 2020.
  7. ^ a b Kidmose, J., Kristensen, K. S. & Struwe, L. B. (2015). Maritim sikkerhed i Arktis: Magtanvendelse og myndighedsudøvelse. (1). Center for Militære Studier.
  8. ^ a b Braat, J.N. (2021, 30/08). Danske Maritime: Regeringens nye strategi er et nybrud for forsvarsindustrien. Altinget. https://www.altinget.dk/arktis/artikel/danske-maritime-regeringens-nye-strategi-er-et-nybrud-for-forsvarsindustrien
  9. ^ a b Udenrigsministeriet. (2024). Styrket maritim sikkerhed. https://um.dk/udenrigspolitik/lande-og-regioner/arktisk-portal/arktisk-strategi/et-fredeligt-og-sikkert-arktisk/styrket-maritim-sikkerhed
  10. ^ The Ilulissat Declaration. (2008). Arctic Ocean Conference Ilulissat, Greenland, 27-29 May 2008. https://um.dk/-/media/websites/umdk/danish-site/udenrigspolitik/lande-og-regioner/arktis/ilulissat_declaration.ashx
  11. ^ Jacobsen, M. (2022, 08/02). Arctic Aspects in Demkark's New Foreign and Security Policy Strategy. The Arctic Institute. https://www.thearcticinstitute.org/arctic-aspects-denmark-new-foreign-security-policy-strategy/
  12. ^ Olesen, M. R. & Sørensen, T. N. (2019). Intensifying Great Power Politics in the Arctic - Points for Consideration by The Kingdom of Denmark: From an analysis of assessments and strategies in Finland, Norway and Iceland. (1). DIIS.
  13. ^ Danish Ministry of Defense. (2021). Artic. https://www.fmn.dk/en/topics/national-tasks/arctic/