 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 7 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,189 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 13 September 2024 by OnlyNano (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 5 September 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by DoubleGrazing 37 days ago. | |
Comment: With the possible (?) exception of the JJ article, none of the sources cited contributes towards notability per WP:NCORP. We need to see significant coverage, directly of the subject, in multiple secondary sources that are reliable and entirely independent of the subject. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:38, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
Bea's Bakery, established by Jules Litwak in 1968,[1] started as a Jewish owned bakery located in Tarzana, California on Ventura Blvd. Lenny Rosenberg and Adaeze Nwanonyiri became owners in October 2022.[2]
The owners have expanded the menu beyond Jewish baking, including ingredients from other cultures such as kola nuts from West Africa.[3]
About the owners
editLenny Rosenberg was born in Plainview, Long Island. He has worked on the East Coast developing restaurants such as Viking Bakery in New Jersey and Strathmore Bagels in New York.
Adaeze Nwanonyiri was born in Houston, Texas. She then moved to New York to study at the New York School of Interior Design. She met Rosenberg in Los Angeles.[4]
LARS
editRosenberg and Nwanonyiri work in LARS which develops and rebrands restaurants, bakeries, and cafes.[5] Rosenberg focuses on operations, while Nwanonyiri covers design.
References
edit- ^ "Jules Litwak Obituary (2023) - Los Angeles, CA - Los Angeles Times". Legacy.com.
- ^ Eckerling, Debra L. (August 10, 2023). "Bea's Bakery Cultures Merge". Jewish Journal.
- ^ "Baking Cupcakes and a Sweet World". YouTube. 9 September 2024.
- ^ "Ebony Love Stories - Celebrating Cultural Differences | EBONY".
- ^ "Home". Lars Restaurant.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.