Submission declined on 17 June 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 10 June 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by DoubleGrazing 16 days ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 4 June 2024 by Qcne (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Qcne 23 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 3 June 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). Resubmitted without any improvement, previous decline still stands. Declined by DoubleGrazing 24 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 3 June 2024 by Chaotic Enby (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Chaotic Enby 24 days ago.
| |
Comment: Primary sources do not establish notability per WP:NCORP. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:34, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
 | This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments, a violation of Wikipedia's terms of use. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. (June 2024) |
BARTEC is a German multinational company and a global provider of hazardous area safety and security solutions, products, and services with its headquarters in Bad Mergentheim in the region of Baden-Württemberg, Germany.[1]
The company was founded in 1975 by Reinhold A. Barlian as a one-man operation. He initially focused on the development and manufacture of a safety switch to prevent explosions at petrol pumps.[2] In 1979, subsidiaries were established in the Netherlands and France under the idea "Europe is domestic". In 1987, the first subsidiary in the Far East was founded in Tokyo. After German reunification, branches were established in Gera, Glesien (North Saxony) and Leipzig. A further subsidiary was founded in the USA in 1994. In Germany, sites in Menden (Sauerland) (AEG production facility) and Gotteszell.[3]
References
edit- ^ "Weltmarktfuehrer-und-Branchen/". Main Tauber Kreis. Retrieved 3 June 2024.
- ^ "Konzepte und Komponenten vom Ex-Schutz bis zur Funktionalen Sicherheit | CHEManager". Chemanager. Retrieved 17 June 2024.
- ^ "BARTEC BENKE GMBH - Gotteszell, Deutschland". Chemie.de. Chemie. Retrieved 17 June 2024.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.