 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 4 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,573 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 12 August 2024 by Utopes (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
AutoAlign[1] is a method proposed in 2024 for Knowledge Graph Alignment (KGA) . It aims to perform KGA without relying on manually annotated "seed alignments", which are typically required by traditional methods. AutoAlign combines large language models, predicate-proximity graphs, and attribute embedding techniques to achieve entity alignment across knowledge graphs.
Background
editKnowledge Graph Alignment (KGA) is the process of identifying and linking equivalent entities across different knowledge graphs. This task is crucial for integrating information from multiple sources and enhancing the overall utility of knowledge graphs. Traditional KGA methods often require a set of pre-aligned entities, known as seed alignments, to initiate the alignment process. However, creating these seed alignments can be time-consuming and may introduce biases.
Method
edit
AutoAlign consists of two main components:
- Predicate Embedding Module: This module aligns predicates across knowledge graphs.
- Entity Alignment Modules: These include an Attribute Embedding Module and an Structure Embedding Module, which work together to align entities.
The Predicate Embedding Module aims to connect predicates with similar meanings (e.g., 'is_in' and 'located_in') from different knowledge graphs (KGs). It creates a predicate proximity graph by merging two KGs and replacing entities with their corresponding types, resulting in triples of the form [type, predicate, type]. The module uses large language models (LLMs) to semantically align the extracted types. By applying graph encoding methods like TransE[2] to this predicate proximity graph, predicates with similar meanings tend to have similar embeddings.
The Attribute Embedding Module and Structure Embedding Module focus on entity alignment. They operate on the principle that similar entities should have similar predicates and related entities in their corresponding triples. Using the aligned predicates from the Predicate Embedding Module and aligned attributes (via Attribute Character Embedding), these modules employ TransE[2] to learn embeddings for entities.
These two modules can be trained alternately or jointly. The resulting embeddings of entities, predicates, attributes, and types are then used to align the knowledge graphs by finding the most similar embeddings across graphs.
Performance
edit
AutoAlign has been evaluated on several benchmark datasets, including the comprehensive DWY-NB benchmark[3]. The evaluation results show that AutoAlign achieves high performance in knowledge graph alignment tasks, particularly in scenarios with limited or no manually annotated seed alignments.
On the DW-NB dataset, AutoAlign achieved a Hits@1 score of 88.73% and a Hits@10 score of 96.91% without using any seed alignments. On the DY-NB dataset, it achieved a Hits@1 score of 91.27% and a Hits@10 score of 95.62% without seed alignments. According to the authors, these results were comparable to or exceeded some methods that use seed alignments[1].
Impact and future directions
editThe development of AutoAlign potentially opens up new research directions in unsupervised learning for knowledge representation. By demonstrating a method for knowledge graph alignment without seed alignments, it may influence future work in knowledge base construction and maintenance.
Potential applications of AutoAlign include:
- Integration of domain-specific graphs with general knowledge graphs
- Enrichment of feature graphs in recommender systems
- Alignment of region graphs in point of interest learning
However, like all methods, AutoAlign may have limitations that require further study. Future research might explore its performance on a wider range of datasets and its applicability to different types of knowledge graphs.
References
edit- ^ a b Zhang, Rui; Su, Yixin; Trisedya, Bayu Distiawan; Zhao, Xiaoyan; Yang, Min; Cheng, Hong; Qi, Jianzhong (June 2024). "AutoAlign: Fully Automatic and Effective Knowledge Graph Alignment Enabled by Large Language Models". IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. 36 (6): 2357–2371. arXiv:2307.11772. doi:10.1109/TKDE.2023.3325484. ISSN 1041-4347.
- ^ a b Bordes, Antoine; Usunier, Nicolas; Garcia-Duran, Alberto; Weston, Jason; Yakhnenko, Oksana (2013). "Translating Embeddings for Modeling Multi-relational Data". Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 26. Curran Associates, Inc.
- ^ Zhang, Rui; Trisedya, Bayu Distiawan; Li, Miao; Jiang, Yong; Qi, Jianzhong (2022-09-01). "A benchmark and comprehensive survey on knowledge graph entity alignment via representation learning". The VLDB Journal. 31 (5): 1143–1168. doi:10.1007/s00778-022-00747-z. ISSN 0949-877X.