 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 4 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,382 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 24 May 2024 by Kline (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 24 May 2024 by JJPMaster (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by JJPMaster 28 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 24 May 2024 by Timtrent (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Timtrent 28 days ago.
| |
Comment: If you cannot find sources then this will never fly here. This is not Schott's Miscellany. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:29, 24 May 2024 (UTC)I understand, but I am making this to be a source of information on the 14 Alton Jones.
The 14 Alton jones is an extinct rimfire cartridge that was made in the 1920s by a gunsmith in Portland Oregon by the name of Alton Jones. The 14 Alton Jones is a necked down .22 Long Rifle to fit a .145 caliber bullet. The round would have achieved 1400-1600 fps out of a 5” revolver barrel with a 15 grain bullet. The round was used in a revolver.[1] In P. O. Ackleys Handbook for shooters and reloaders he says ".14 Jones: A very interesting sub-caliber cartridge is the .14 Jones." [1]The 14 Alton Jones Rimfire was never a commercially available cartridge and was never adopted by any big factory loaders like Remington Arms , Winchester Arms, or Federal Cartridge Company, so it is classified as such a Wildcat cartridge. The round was first loaded with DuPont #80 gunpowder which burned faster than most other gun powders at the time.[2] The cartridge is loaded with 15-25 grain bullets. There is only 1 known revolver that is chambered in 14 Alton Jones.[1] The 14 Alton Jones is one of the many cartridges made by Alton Jones. The sibling cartridges are the .145 Alton Jones, .17 Scorpion, .240 Rimless, and the .26 Pistol cartridge.[3]
•
References
editMore information on the 14 Alton Jones rimfire
More information on the 14 Alton Jones rimfire
More information on the 14 Alton jones rimfire
Also see
edit- ^ a b c ".14" Alford Jones Express rimfire caliber revolver". castboolits.gunloads.com.
- ^ ".14 Alton Jones RimFire / MUNICION.ORG". old.municion.org.
- ^ "THE CARTRIDGE COLLECTOR". www.oldammo.com.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.