Draft:"Scientific Mystery"

Submission declined on 6 February 2024 by Stuartyeates (talk).

It appears that your submission is either an attempt to be humorous rather than factual, or is an obvious hoax. As Wikipedia strives to contain only factual entries, we can not accept your submission at this time.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by Stuartyeates 5 months ago. Last edited by Auric 28 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Resubmit

Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

A scientific mystery is a natural phenomenon that can be described, but not explained. The most famous of these is the ancient "mind-body problem", which is the challenge of explaining subjective (1st person) experience in scientific (3rd person) terms. A scientific mystery is not just an unsolved problem, but one with no known approach. Across the various sciences, the notion of mystery takes on radically different forms, with profound effects on theory and experiment in that field.

In striking contrast, there is almost no explicit study of scientific mysteries in the social and life sciences (except biology). There are identified unsolved problems (ref), but these are not labeled as mysteries. There seems to be no consensus on why, but it certainly depends in part on the profundity of the mind-body problem.

^[1]

References

^ Fox1, Goodale2, Bourne3, Melvyn1, James2 (2020). "The Age-Dependent Neural Substrates of Blindsight". Trends in Neuroscience43. 43 (1).{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)

2. ^Iriki, A. et al. (1996) Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. Neuroreport. 1996 Oct 2;7(14):2325-30.

[1] Fox1, Goodale2, Bourne3, Melvyn1, James2 (2020). "The Age-Dependent Neural Substrates of Blindsight". Trends in Neuroscience43. 43 (1).{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)

[1]