Cost of poor quality

Cost of poor quality (COPQ) or poor quality costs (PQC) or cost of nonquality, are costs that would disappear if systems, processes, and products were perfect.

COPQ was popularized by IBM quality expert H. James Harrington in his 1987 book Poor-Quality Cost. COPQ is a refinement of the concept of quality costs. In the 1960s, IBM undertook an effort to study its own quality costs and tailored the concept for its own use. While Feigenbaum's term "quality costs" is technically accurate, it's easy for the uninitiated to jump to the conclusion that better quality products cost more to produce. Harrington adopted the name "poor quality costs" to emphasize the belief that investment in detection and prevention of product failures is more than offset by the savings in reductions in product failures.

Harrington breaks down COPQ into the following elements:

Cost	Description
Direct poor-quality costs Controllable poor-quality cost Prevention cost Appraisal cost Resultant poor-quality cost Internal error cost External error cost Equipment poor-quality cost	Direct COPQ can be directly derived from entries in the company ledger. Controllable COPQ is directly controllable costs to ensure that only acceptable products and services reach the customer. Resultant COPQ are costs incurred because unacceptable products and services were delivered to the customer, resulting from earlier decisions about how much to invest in controllable COPQ. Equipment COPQ are costs to invest in equipment to measure, accept, or control a product or service. It is treated separately from controllable costs to accommodate the effects of depreciation.
Indirect poor-quality costs Customer-incurred cost Customer-dissatisfaction cost Loss-of-reputation cost	Indirect COPQ is difficult to measure because it is a delayed result of time, effort, and financial costs incurred by the customer. These customer costs add up to lost sales and therefore do not appear in the company's ledger.

Examples

Cost element			Examples
Direct poor-quality costs	Controllable poor-quality cost	Prevention cost	Quality planning (for test, inspection, audits, process control) Education and training Performing capability analyses Conducting design reviews
		Appraisal cost	Test and inspection Supplier acceptance sampling Auditing processes
	Resultant poor-quality cost	Internal error cost	In-process scrap and rework Troubleshooting and repairing Design changes Additional inventory required to support poor process yields and rejected lots Reinspection and retest of reworked items Downgrading
		External error cost	Sales returns and allowances Service level agreement penalties Complaint handling Field service labor and parts costs incurred due to warranty obligations
	Equipment poor-quality cost		Micrometers, voltmeters, automated test equipment (but not equipment used to make the product)
Indirect poor-quality costs	Customer-incurred cost		Loss of productivity due to product or service downtime Travel costs and time spent to return defective product Repair costs after warranty period Backup product or service to cover failure periods
	Customer-dissatisfaction cost		Dissatisfaction shared by word of mouth
	Loss-of-reputation cost		Customer perception of firm

White collar COPQ

Harrington noted that expanding cost analyses to management and clerical workers could also make a significant dent in waste. He defined the following costs by functional area:

Functional area	Controllable COPQ	Resultant COPQ
Controller COPQ	Timecard reviews Capital equipment reviews Invoicing reviews	Billing errors Incorrect accounting entries Payroll errors
Software COPQ	Design reviews Code reviews	Crashes Deadlocks Incorrect outputs
Plant administration COPQ	Security Facility inspection and testing Machine maintenance training	Disclosure of trade secrets Facilities redesign Overstaffing/understaffing Equipment downtime/idle time
Purchasing COPQ	Vendor reviews Periodic vendor surveys Follow-up on delivery dates Strike built-in costs	Line-down cost Excessive inventory due to suppliers Premium freight cost
Marketing COPQ	Sales material review Marketing forecast Customer surveys Sales training	Overstock Loss of market share Incorrect order entry
Personnel COPQ	Prescreening applications Appraisal reviews Exit interviews Attendance tracking	Absenteeism Turnover Grievances
Industrial engineering COPQ	Packaging evaluations Layout reviews OSHA reports Inspection of contract work	OSHA fines Shipping damage Redoing layout Paying contractors for poor work

Cost of poor quality by inception point

The damages of poor quality augment as the inception point is further down the supply chain:
TCFP [Total Cost of Faulty Part] =
Direct Cost (manufacturing cost)
➔ failure at supplier's site (bad)
+ Labor Cost (assembly and testing)
+ Overhead Cost (Inventory, handling, shipping costs)
+ Scrapping Cost (of part and attached parts assemblies: Sometimes assemblies cannot be disassembled and have to be scrapped altogether)
+ Rework (applying a new part instead)
➔ failure at manufacturer's site (worse)
+ Repair / Recall Costs (these are costs associated with repairing or replacing a new part / assembly under warranty)
+ Product Liability Costs (These are costs resulting from damages caused by the faulty part to 3rd parties)
➔ failure at customers' site (worst)

See also

• Gold in the mine
• Quality costs

References

• Jeffery, Arthur B. (2003). "Managing Quality: Modeling the Cost of Quality Improvement" (PDF). Southwest Business and Economics Journal. 12. Retrieved 1 August 2024.
• Crosby, Philip B. (1980). Quality is Free: The Art of Making Quality Certain. New American Library. ISBN 978-0-451-61961-7. Retrieved 1 August 2024.