In mathematics, specifically in complex analysis, Cauchy's estimate gives local bounds for the derivatives of a holomorphic function. These bounds are optimal.

Statement and consequence

edit

Let   be a holomorphic function on the open ball   in  . If   is the sup of   over  , then Cauchy's estimate says:[1] for each integer  ,

 

where   is the n-th complex derivative of  ; i.e.,   and   (see Wirtinger derivatives § Relation with complex differentiation).

Moreover, taking   shows the above estimate cannot be improved.

As a corollary, for example, we obtain Liouville's theorem, which says a bounded entire function is constant (indeed, let   in the estimate.) Slightly more generally, if   is an entire function bounded by   for some constants   and some integer  , then   is a polynomial.[2]

Proof

edit

We start with Cauchy's integral formula applied to  , which gives for   with  ,

 

where  . By the differentiation under the integral sign (in the complex variable),[3] we get:

 

Thus,

 

Letting   finishes the proof.  

(The proof shows it is not necessary to take   to be the sup over the whole open disk, but because of the maximal principle, restricting the sup to the near boundary would not change  .)

edit

Here is a somehow more general but less precise estimate. It says:[4] given an open subset  , a compact subset   and an integer  , there is a constant   such that for every holomorphic function   on  ,

 

where   is the Lebesgue measure.

This estimate follows from Cauchy's integral formula (in the general form) applied to   where   is a smooth function that is   on a neighborhood of   and whose support is contained in  . Indeed, shrinking  , assume   is bounded and the boundary of it is piecewise-smooth. Then, since  , by the integral formula,

 

for   in   (since   can be a point, we cannot assume   is in  ). Here, the first term on the right is zero since the support of   lies in  . Also, the support of   is contained in  . Thus, after the differentiation under the integral sign, the claimed estimate follows.

As an application of the above estimate, we can obtain the Stieltjes–Vitali theorem, [5] which says that that a sequence of holomorphic functions on an open subset   that is bounded on each compact subset has a subsequence converging on each compact subset (necessarily to a holomorphic function since the limit satisfies the Cauchy–Riemann equations). Indeed, the estimate implies such a sequence is equicontinuous on each compact subset; thus, Ascoli's theorem and the diagonal argument give a claimed subsequence.

In several variables

edit

Cauchy's estimate is also valid for holomorphic functions in several variables. Namely, for a holomorphic function   on a polydisc  , we have:[6] for each multiindex  ,

 

where  ,   and  .

As in the one variable case, this follows from Cauchy's integral formula in polydiscs. § Related estimate and its consequence also continue to be valid in several variables with the same proofs.[7]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ Rudin 1986, Theorem 10.26.
  2. ^ Rudin 1986, Ch 10. Exercise 4.
  3. ^ This step is Exercise 7 in Ch. 10. of Rudin 1986
  4. ^ Hörmander 1990, Theorem 1.2.4.
  5. ^ Hörmander 1990, Corollary 1.2.6.
  6. ^ Hörmander 1990, Theorem 2.2.7.
  7. ^ Hörmander 1990, Theorem 2.2.3., Corollary 2.2.5.
  • Hörmander, Lars (1990) [1966], An Introduction to Complex Analysis in Several Variables (3rd ed.), North Holland, ISBN 978-1-493-30273-4
  • Rudin, Walter (1986). Real and Complex Analysis (International Series in Pure and Applied Mathematics). McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-054234-1.

Further reading

edit