Category talk:Sound laws

Linguistics: Phonetics / Theoretical Linguistics / Applied Linguistics

	Linguistics portal This category is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
	This category is supported by Phonetics Task Force.
	This category is supported by Theoretical Linguistics Task Force.
	This category is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Languages

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles

Indo-European sub-category?

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It seems like a lot of the sound laws here belong to Indo-European languages.

On the one hand, it would probably make sense to group them together, so that they're easier to categorize.

On the other hand, maybe it'd take away from being able to accidentally stumble on one of PIE's laws. Furthermore, at what point we say that the sound changers are no longer PIE, but Proto-Baltic or Proto-Balto-Slavic or Proto-Centum etc.? When do we distinguish between the earliest changes, and those of sub-branches?

What about the English section? Is it part of the IE ones? Should we lump all the IE languages together, or keep them apart as possible (see prev. paragraph, 2nd sentence)? Shibolet Nehrd (talk) 04:58, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic