Category talk:Headlines

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Herostratus in topic Split, or rename?

Split, or rename?

edit

One of the articles in the category (Is God Dead?) is actually a magazine cover, and there's room for more... arguably Time Person of the Year, and then I was thinking of writing an article that would fit (probably won't tho)... "Headlines" right now includes newpaper front-page headlines AND article headlines... a magazine cover is sort of a headline, n'est-ca pas? But I wouldn't want to put in more covers without changing the name to "Headlines and magazine covers" I guess? So I'm suggesting this. Objections?

More blather: Category:Lists of covers of Time (magazine) would then be made a subcat of this cat, which would integrate those articles a bit more... so would List of Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue cover models I suppose. There is also Category:Fair use magazine covers, which is gigantic category with many subs, all the entities being image files (it possibly shouldn't exist IMO because it lists fair-use images out of context, but it does). A Category:Magazine covers supercat would make sense for that, but there is no such category , so the only supercat for Category:Fair use magazine covers that matters is Category:Magazines, which is a bit of a leap...

So I'm seeing these possibilities:

I'm for #2. I think that "headline" and "magazine cover" are closely enough related as to no warrant being entirely separated, as #3 would do, and indeed closely enough so that #4, which creates a new small category for just magazine covers, is not warranted. So I propose to do this presently absent any objections. Herostratus (talk) 18:03, 1 January 2022 (UTC)Reply