Category talk:Critics of Scientology
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Scholarlyarticles in topic Deletion
 | This category was nominated for deletion on 12 September 2017. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This category was nominated for deletion on 21 April 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Carlos Mencia
editCarlos should be add as scientology critic.He often pokes fun at it because he thinks is retarded to believe that.
Deletion
editJust what is the point of this page? Imagine a page with critics of Christianity, it would go on for pages. What function does this page have.Chrisp7 09:24, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- I agree wholeheartedly. I think this is a flawed category. As a a construct, what is its contrast pole? L. Ron Hubbard and Scientology followers? Anyone who has never said a word about it? I think it's okay to have a Scientology category but "Critics of Scientology" as a category is card-stacking and has too much potential for creating abuses. Once tagged as a critic of Scientology, the Wikipedia entry could become a target, especially given the philosophy of "attack the attacker" as noted on the Scientology page. I have no dog in this fight. I have noticed a few instances of where pages get tagged with this category getting completely mauled.I just don't think Wikipedia should get involved in any campaign to target people. I second the nomination for deletion of this categoryScholarlyarticles (talk) 20:20, 24 December 2013 (UTC)