Category talk:Argentine popes

This category was nominated for deletion on 14 March 2013. The result of the discussion was keep.

This category is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve Argentine popes, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles

Catholicism

Argentine popes is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Untitled

Seriously? Can we maybe wait until the next one before opening a category?

We don't need this category.

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This is superfluous. RGloucester (talk) 20:43, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Does he require a one man category 22:01, 13 March 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjjimg (talk • contribs)

Agreed. 76.188.98.89 (talk) 04:42, 14 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Please Delete

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I'm more of a casual reader, but this category seems to be extremely unneeded. If I delete is, some bot will most likely put it back so it would be nice if someone deleted it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.91.13.39 (talk) 18:00, 16 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

This was already discussed at CFD with a consensus to retain the category. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 18:02, 16 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic