Andresen v. Maryland, 427 U.S. 463 (1976), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that search of petitioner's offices for business records, their seizure, and subsequent introduction into evidence did not offend the Fifth Amendment's proscription that "[n]o person ... shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself." Although the records seized contained statements that petitioner voluntarily had committed to writing, he was never required to say anything.

Andresen v. Maryland
Argued February 25, 1976
Decided June 29, 1976
Full case namePeter C. Andresen, Petitioner v. State of Maryland
Citations427 U.S. 463 (more)
96 S. Ct. 2737; 49 L. Ed. 2d 627
ArgumentOral argument
Case history
PriorCertiorari to the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Holding
The searches and seizures were not "unreasonable" in violation of the Fourth Amendment.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
William J. Brennan Jr. · Potter Stewart
Byron White · Thurgood Marshall
Harry Blackmun · Lewis F. Powell Jr.
William Rehnquist · John P. Stevens
Case opinions
MajorityBlackmun, joined by Burger, Stewart, White, Powell, Rehnquist, Stevens
DissentBrennan
DissentMarshall
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. IV

See also

edit

Further reading

edit
  • Brennan, William J. (1977). "State Constitutions and the Protection of Individual Rights". Harvard Law Review. 90 (3). The Harvard Law Review Association: 489–504. doi:10.2307/1340334. JSTOR 1340334. S2CID 149466776.
  • Lee, H. (1976). "Private Papers Now Subject to Reasonable Search and Seizure—Andresen v. Maryland". DePaul Law Review. 26: 848. ISSN 0011-7188.
  • Pidgeon, Mary Ann Kenny (1978). "Miller, Fisher and Andresen: Assistance for Investigations of White Collar Crime". Criminal Justice Quarterly. 6: 38. ISSN 0092-3907.
  • Posen, S. O. (1976). "A Paper Chase: The Search and Seizure of Personal Business Records". Brooklyn Law Review. 43: 489. ISSN 0007-2362.
edit