Active reviews for intermediate designs

In software engineering, active reviews for intermediate designs (ARID) is a method to evaluate software architectures, especially on an intermediate level, i.e. for non-finished architectures.[1] It combines aspects from scenario-based design review techniques, such as the architecture tradeoff analysis method (ATAM) and the software architecture analysis method (SAAM), as well as active design reviews (ADR).[2]

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ Active reviews of intermediate designs (ARID) - Software Architect's Handbook [Book]
  2. ^ Clements, Paul; Kazman, Rick; Klein, Mark (2002). Evaluating Software Architecture: Methods and Case Studies. Boston: Addison Wesley Professional. pp. 241–242. ISBN 0-201-70482-X.
edit