This user has been the victim
of an unintentional block.

JAMARIWIKI IS CURRENTLY BLOCKED FROM WIKIPEDIA! HIS BLOCK WILL LAST FOR: The block will not expire.

Welcome to my talk page. Here are some tips to help you communicate with me:

  • Please continue any conversation on the page where it was started.
    • If I have left a message on your talk page please DO NOT post a reply here. I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.
  • Add or respond to an existing conversation under the existing heading.
    • Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
    • Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.
  • To initiate a new conversation on this page, please click on this link.
  • You should sign your comments. You can do this automatically by typing four tildes (~~~~).

Months are ordered from newest from oldest.

OCTOBER 2022

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
--Blablubbs (talk) 23:06, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

UNBLOCK NOTICE FROM JAMARIWIKI

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JamariWiki (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

SusBot NG 2.0 was a test block account by me to test to see like if a user gets blocked impersonating a bot (like ClueBot NG), which is actually a human, that makes unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. I make useful contributions, and I just warned a user because they added a speedy deletion tag using Twinkle. This is totally not me. I REPEAT, SUSBOT NG WAS A BLOCK TEST ACCOUNT MADE BY ME TO SEE LIKE IF A USER GETS BLOCKED IMPERSONATING A BOT WHICH IS ACTUALLY A HUMAN THAT MAKES TEST UNCONSTRUCTIVE EDITS TO WIKIPEDIA! I REPEAT! SUSBOT NG IS A BLOCKING TEST ACCOUNT MADE BY ME!!!!!!!!!1!!!!


you just made a user that uses Twinkle angry...JamariWiki (talk) 23:15, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

It looks like your test to see if you could get blocked was successful. Also, this "I'm not a sock puppeteer" claim would be more believable if you hadn't immediately created User:SusBot NG 2.1 after the other one was blocked. It also looks like this has gone on for a while. I see logged-out vandalism at the very least. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:48, 29 October 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JamariWiki (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This is the response to the declined block review. These block tests were actually developed to make sure the Wikipedia blocking system was working fine. The SusBot 2.1 was considered the final blocking test, and then everything would go back to normal on Wikipedia. These fake bots that got blocked were only tests. JamariWiki (talk) 14:07, 29 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Breaching experiments are not need nor appreciated; see WP:NOTHERE. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:47, 29 October 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

JULY 2021

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sistema Único de Saúde have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:13, 3 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Chris (talk) 00:13, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Sistema Único de Saúde, you may be blocked from editing. --Chris (talk) 00:15, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. HurricaneEdgar 00:21, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Sistema Único de Saúde. --Chris (talk) 00:22, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 07:22, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

OCTOBER 2020 =

edit

  Hello, I'm 67.85.37.186. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.67.85.37.186 (talk) 21:26, 5 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

SEPTEMBER 2020

edit

JamariWiki, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi JamariWiki! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 21 September 2020 (UTC)